- Visibility 83 Views
- Downloads 18 Downloads
- Permissions
- DOI 10.18231/j.ijca.2020.104
-
CrossMark
- Citation
To evaluate the efficacy between 0.15mg/Kg and 0.25mg/Kg of iv labetalol in the suppression of haemodynamic response to extubation
- Author Details:
-
Sindhu S *
-
V Y Srinivas
Abstract
Background: Tracheal extubation process evokes stress response which causes autonomic variations such as tachycardia, rise in systolic arterial blood pressure and diastolic arterial blood pressure which is potentially lethal in high risk patients.
Thus this study is conducted to compare the efficacy between 0.15mg/kg and 0.25mg/kg of iv Labetalol in the suppression of haemodynamic response to Extubation.
Materials and Methods: 60 participants aged between 18-55 yrs belonging to ASA 1 or 2 were randomly allocated into 2 groups. Group Lb received injection Labetalol 0.15mg/kg and Group Lt received injection Labetalol 0.25mg/kg. Heart rate, systolic arterial blood pressure and diastolic arterial blood pressure were recorded at basal, two, five, eight minutes after drug infusion, at extubation and one, three, five, eight, ten and fifteen minutes post extubation.
Results: Group Lt showed a better lowering values in heart rate, systolic arterial blood pressure and diastolic arterial blood pressure after drug infusion, at Extubation, and fifteen minutes post Extubation compared to Group Lb.
Conclusion: Injection Labetalol 0.25mg/kg showed a effective suppression of haemodynamic response to Extubation compared to injection Labetalol 0.15mg/kg.
Introduction
The surgeries performed with securement of airway with endotracheal tube placement will be followed by extubation at the end of surgical procedure. Extubation may be associated with upper airway obstruction, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, tachycardia, hypertension and dysrhythmias. Thus a smooth extubation is essential to avoid the consequences that arise due to rise in plasma concentration of catechlamines.[1]
Different methods had experimented with aiming for smooth extubation such as extubation in deep planes of anaesthesia and usage of pharmacological modes such as lidocaine, opioids, calcium channel blockers,ย ย magnesium sulphate and propofol but none of them were fully efficacious.[2], [3] Labetalol is a combined alpha and beta-adrenoceptor antagonist. It is a salicylamide derivative.[4] It is an antihypertensive drug available in oral and parenteral form.Labetalol shows selective antagonist activity over alpha-1 adrenergic receptors and nonselective blockade over beta-1 and beta-2 adrenergic receptors.[5] It shows antagonist activity over alpha and beta receptors in the ratio of alpha: beta = 1:7 for intravenous administration.[6] Thus the present study is undertaken to evaluate the efficacy between 0.15mg/kg and 0.25mg/kg of iv Labetalol in the suppression of haemodynamic response to extubation.
Materials and Methods
After obtaining clearance from ethical committee and informed risk consent was taken from all the 60 patients who were belonging to ASA class 1 or 2 and of the age group 18 โ 55 yrs.
Name of the group were enclosed in opaque sealed envelopes which were later shuffled based on which the participants were divided into two groups. Patients with cardiac, renal and hepatic impairement, cerebral disease, difficult airway, heart blocks, bradycardia(heart rate <60bpm) were excluded from the study.
Group Lb- injection Labetalol 0.15mg/kg body weight was diluted with normal saline upto 10ml and administered intravenously over a period of 10 minutes using a syringe pump before extubation.
Group Lt - injection Labetalol 0.25mg/kg body weight diluted with normal saline upto 10ml and administered intravenously over a period of 10 minutes using a syringe pump before extubation.
Injection Midazolam 0.05mg/kg body weight and injection ondansetron 0.1mg/kg body weight were given as premedications to all the patients and all patients were induced with 5mg/kg injection thiopentone and 0.1 mg/kg injection vecuronium.
Anaesthesia was maintained with oxygen, nitrous oxide, isoflurane with intermittent dose of injection vecuronium.
0.15mg/kg of injection Labetalol diluted with normal saline upto 10ml administered intravenously over 10 minutes using a syringe pump before extubation for the group Lb and 0.25mg/kg injection Labetalol diluted with normal saline upto 10ml administered intravenously over 10 minutes before extubation for group Lt. At the end of the procedure, Reversal of neuromuscular blockade was done using 0.05mg/kg body weight of inj Neostigmine and 0.01mg/kg body weight of inj glycopyrrolate at the end of the procedure.
Haemodynamic parameters such as heart rate,systolic arterial blood pressure and diastolic arterial blood pressure were recorded at basal, two, five, eight minutes after drug infusion, at the time of extubation and at one, three, five, eight, ten and fifteen minutes postextubation.
Statistical analysis
After discussion with the statistician and on the basis of pilot study observations, for ensuring a power of study 0.80 and assumption of 5% patients would drop out, the final study sample size was fixed at 30 patients in each group.
Results
Demographic variables such as weight, age, sex were comparable.
Heart rate
Group Lb and group Lt did not show any statistically significant difference with respect to the basal mean heart rate.
The mean heart rate showed a decreased trend in group Lb and group Lt after drug infusion and at one, three, five, eight and fifteen minutes post extubation but the statistically significant fall in mean heart rate was noted in group Lt compared to group Lb.
The mean heart rate was rised by 9bpm(10.4%) at the extubation in group Lb whereas the mean heart rate was rised by 3bpm(4%) at extubation in group Lt compared to basal value which was statistically significant.
The mean heart rate was below the basal value even at fifteen minutes postextubation in group Lb and group Lt.

Systolic arterial blood pressure and diastolic arterial blood pressure
There was no statistically significant difference with respect to the basal value of mean systolic arterial blood pressure and mean diastolic arterial blood pressure among the group Lb and group Lt.
The mean systolic arterial pressure and mean diastolic arterial pressure showed a falling trend upon drug infusion and one, three, five, eight and fifteen minutes postextubation in group Lb and group Lt but a statistically significant falling trend was noticed in group Lt compared to group Lb.
The mean systolic arterial blood pressure and mean diastolic arterial blood pressure was lowered by 2mmhg(2%) and 2mmhg(2%) respectively in group Lb at the time of extubation but the mean systolic arterial blood pressure was lowered by 5mmhg(4%) and the mean diastolic arterial blood pressure was lowered by 4mmhg(6%) in group Lt compared to baseline value at the time of extubation which was statistically significant.
The mean systolic arterial blood pressure and mean diastolic arterial blood pressure was below the baseline value even after fifteen minutes postextubation.


Discussion
The Extubation process evokes haemodynamic stress response due epipharyngeal and laryngopharyngeal stimulation. The stress response manifests in the form of autonomic disturbances such as hypertension, tachycardia, arrhythmias and also associated with coughing, straining and bronchospasm.[2], [7]
Richards et al in 1974 used Labetalol as a combined alpha and beta-adrenoceptor antagonist and used in the medical treatment of hypertension.[4]
Labetalol has two optical centres with four isomers. The R, R isomer is about four times more potent as a ฮฒ receptor antagonist than racemic Labetalol but it is less than 20% potent as an alpha 1 antagonist compared to racemic mixture.[8]
Labetalol exhibits equilibrium-competitive antagonism at beta and alpha receptors. Labetalol by causing alpha-1 blockade decreases the blood pressure whereas tachycardia will be attenuated by simultaneous beta blockade. This property of Labetalol helps to supress the haemodynamic stress response.[9], [10]
Labetalol is a moderately lipid soluble drug with the peak effect on Intravenous administration is 5 -15 minutes.[11]
In the study conducted by Kumar R et al.[12] between 0.15mg/kg and 0.3mg/kg doses of Labetalol on suppression of pressor responses to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation, the authors found out that both the doses of Labetalol were efficient in supressing the haemodynamic stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation in a dose dependent manner.
In the study conducted by Younes M M et al.[13] comparing labetalol with fentanyl and lidocaine, Labetalol was better in attenuation of haemodynamic stress response to extubation.
In the studies conducted by Ratnani et al.,[13] Jaiswal A et al.,[14] Anand KJ et al. [15] Labetalol effectively suppressed the sympathoadrenal response to intubation.
The studies are very deficient comparing the various doses of Labetalol which can be used effectively to suppress the pressor response to extubation, which made us to undertake this study.
The onset of action of IV Labetalol starts within 2-5 minutes with peak effect occurs between 5-15 minutes. Hence in our study we administered the study dosages of IV Labetalol diluted to 10ml with normal saline given 10 minutes before extubation using a syringe pump.
On analysis of our study results, at extubation, the rise in the mean heart rate was 9bpm(10.4%), the fall in mean systolic arterial blood pressure and diastolic arterial blood pressure was 2mmhg(2%) and 2mmhg(2%) respectively in 0.15mg/kg of iv Labetalol group whereas the rise in mean heart rate was 3bpm(4%), the fall in mean systolic arterial blood pressure was 5mmhg(4%) and the fall in mean diastolic arterial blood pressure was 4mmhg (6%) compared to baseline value in the group who were administered 0.25mg/kg of iv Labetalol. In both the groups, the mean heart rate, mean systolic arterial blood pressure and diastolic arterial blood pressure remained below the baseline even 15minutes postextubation. Even though both the doses attenuated the haemodynamic response to extubation,the dose of 0.25mg/kg of iv Labetalol was more effective in maintaining stable haemodynamics.
In the study conducted by Kunakeri SB et al., [16] at 1minute postintubation, it was observed that in L1 group (0.1mg/kg), the mean heart rate was rised by 14bpm, the rise in mean systolic blood pressure was 20mmhg and the rise in mean diastolic blood pressure was 7mmhg compared to baseline value whereas in the group L2(0.2mg/kg), the rise in mean heart rate was 10bpm, the mean rise in systolic blood pressure was 9mmhg, the rise in mean diastolic blood pressure was 5mmhg compared to baseline value. Thus they concluded that both the doses effectively attenuated the haemodynamic response to intubation in a dose dependent manner.
Limitation of Our Study
More accurate results will be obtained if invasive blood pressure monitoring is done.
Benefits of Our Study
Labetalol in a dose of 0.25mg/kg efficiently attenuate the haemodynamic response thereby prevents the untoward complications due to stress response of extubation.
There were no statistically significant side effects in our study.
Conclusion
From our study, it was found that iv Labetalol 0.25mg/kg administered 10 minutes prior to extubation effectively suppressed the haemodynamic response to extubation compared to iv Labetalol 0.15mg/kg.
Source of Funding
None.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper
References
- Hartley M, Vaughan RS. Problems associated with tracheal extubation. Br J Anaesth. 1993;71(4):561-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Minogue SC, Ralph J, Lampa MJ. Laryngotracheal Topicalization with Lidocaine Before Intubation Decreases the Incidence of Coughing on Emergence from General Anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2004;99(4):1253-7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Gonzalez RM, Bjerke RJ, Drobycki T, Stapelfeldt WH, Green JM, Janowitz MJ. Prevention of endotracheal tube-induced coughing during emergence from general anesthesia. Anesthe Analg. 1994;79(4):792-5. [Google Scholar]
- Cope DHP, Crawford MC. Labetalol in controlled hypotension. Administration of labetalol when adequate hypotension is difficult to achieve. Br J Anaesth. 1979;51. [Google Scholar]
- Babita, Singh B, Saiyed A, Meena R, Verma I, Vyas C. A comparative study of labetalol and fentanyl on the sympathomimetic response to laryngoscopy and intubation in vascular surgeries. Karnataka Anaesth J. 2015;1(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Singh SP, Quadir A, Malhotra P. Comparison of esmolol and labetalol, in low doses, for attenuation of sympathomimetic response to laryngoscopy and intubation. Saudi J Anaesth. 2010;4(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Lowrie A, Johnston PL, Fell D, Robinson SL. Cardiovascular and plasma catecholamine responses at tracheal extubation. Br J Anaesth. 1992;68(3):261-3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Ebadi M. . Desk reference of clinical pharmacology. 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Stoelting RK, Hillier SC. Pharmacology and physiology in anesthetic practice. Handbook of Pharmacology and Physiology in Anesthetic Practice. 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Westfall DP, Craig C, Stitzel RE. Adrenoceptor antagonist. Modern Pharmacology with Clinical Applications. 2004. [Google Scholar]
- MacCarthy EP, Bloomfield SS. Labetalol: a review of its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical uses and adverse effects. Pharmacother. 1983;3(4):193-219. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Kumar R, Gandhi R, Mallick I, Wadhwa R, Adlakha N, Bose M. Attenuation of hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation with two different doses of labetalol in hypertensive patients. Egypt J Anaesth. 2016;32(3):339-44. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Sanjeev OP, Ratnani E, Singh A, Tripathi M, Chourasia HK. A comparative study of intravenous esmolol, labetalol and lignocaine in low doses for attenuation of sympathomimetic responses to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. Anesth: Essays Res. 2017;11(3):745-50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Jaiswal A, Pawar D, Bhople P. Attenuation of pressor response by intravenous Labetalol and its comparison with intravenous lignocaine. Indian J Res. 2017;6(7):45-7. [Google Scholar]
- Anand KJ, Jadeja PD. Attenuation of sympathomimetic response to laryngoscopy and intubation. Comparative study of esmolol and labetalol treatment. Medpulse - International Medical Journal. 2017;4(5):596-600. [Google Scholar]
- Kunakeri SB, Haq MM. Effectiveness of injection Labetalol in two different dosages for attenuation of Haemodynamic response to Direct laryngoscopy and oral endotracheal intubation. A Randomized Double Blind Trial. J Evid Based Med Healthcare. 2016;3(70):3816-20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
How to Cite This Article
Vancouver
S S, Srinivas VY. To evaluate the efficacy between 0.15mg/Kg and 0.25mg/Kg of iv labetalol in the suppression of haemodynamic response to extubation [Internet]. Indian J Clin Anaesth. 2020 [cited 2025 Sep 23];7(4):575-578. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2020.104
APA
S, S., Srinivas, V. Y. (2020). To evaluate the efficacy between 0.15mg/Kg and 0.25mg/Kg of iv labetalol in the suppression of haemodynamic response to extubation. Indian J Clin Anaesth, 7(4), 575-578. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2020.104
MLA
S, Sindhu, Srinivas, V Y. "To evaluate the efficacy between 0.15mg/Kg and 0.25mg/Kg of iv labetalol in the suppression of haemodynamic response to extubation." Indian J Clin Anaesth, vol. 7, no. 4, 2020, pp. 575-578. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2020.104
Chicago
S, S., Srinivas, V. Y.. "To evaluate the efficacy between 0.15mg/Kg and 0.25mg/Kg of iv labetalol in the suppression of haemodynamic response to extubation." Indian J Clin Anaesth 7, no. 4 (2020): 575-578. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2020.104