- Visibility 693 Views
- Downloads 460 Downloads
- Permissions
- DOI 10.18231/j.ijca.2025.066
-
CrossMark
- Citation
Comparison of patient state index and end tidal anaesthetic concentration monitoring on recovery profile in desflurane based anaesthesia in neurosurgical population
Background and Objective: A variety of EEG-derived monitors have emerged to track cerebral electrical patterns during general anaesthesia with the goal of improving emergence quality. This study aimed to evaluate recovery characteristics when guiding desflurane based anaesthesia by either the patient state index (PSI) or by measuring end tidal anaesthetic concentration (ETAC) in neurosurgical patients.
Materials and Methods: A total of 108 adult patients (aged 18–65 years) undergoing elective neurosurgery were enrolled in this randomised controlled trial to compare two strategies for anaesthetic depth monitoring: one based on end-tidal anaesthetic concentration (ETAC) and the other on the Patient State Index (PSI). All patients received a standardized general anaesthetic regimen consisting of oxygen, nitrous oxide, and desflurane. In the ETAC group, anaesthetic depth was maintained at a minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of 0.8–1, whereas in the PSI group, the target was a Patient State Index (PSI) between 25 and 50. Recovery parameters included the emergence time, the ability to respond to verbal commands, and the duration until extubation. Additionally, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, along with total consumption of desflurane and fentanyl, were documented.
Results: The mean emergence time was 4.94 ± 1.63 minutes in the ETAC group compared to 4.00 ± 1.78 minutes in the PSI group (P = 0.005). The time to respond to verbal commands averaged 5.46 ± 1.80 minutes in the ETAC group versus 4.35 ± 1.66 minutes in the PSI group (P = 0.001). Extubation occurred at 8.07 ± 1.80 minutes in the ETAC group and at 6.65 ± 2.31 minutes in the PSI group (P = 0.001). Desflurane usage was similar between the groups, with the PSI group receiving 18.15 ± 5.88 ml and the ETAC group 18.7 ± 6.21 ml (P = 0.634). Hemodynamic parameters remained stable and comparable across both groups.
Conclusion: Monitoring the depth of anaesthesia with the Patient State Index facilitates a more rapid postoperative recovery compared to ETAC-guided anaesthesia in neurosurgical patients receiving desflurane, without adversely affecting hemodynamic stability.
Keywords: Patient state index, End-tidal anaesthetic concentration, Recovery profile, Desflurane.
References
- Sudhakaran R, Makkar JK, Jain D, Wig J, Chabra R. Comparison of bispectral index and end-tidal anaesthetic concentration monitoring on recovery profile of desflurane in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Indian J Anaesth. 2018;62(7):516–23.
- Drover DR, Lemmen HJ, Pierce ET, Plourd G, Loyd G, Ornstein E, et al. Titration of delivery and recovery from propofol, alfentanil, and nitrous oxide anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2002;97(1):82–9.
- Soehle M, Ellerkmann RK, Grube M, Kuech M, Wirz S, Hoeft A, et al. Comparison between bispectral index and patient state index as measures of the electroencephalographic effects of sevoflurane. Anesthesiology. 2008;109(5):799–805.
- Schneider G, Gelb AW, Schmeller B, Tschakert R, Kochs E. Detection of awareness in surgical patients with EEG-based indices—bispectral index and patient state index. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91(3):329–35.
- Dias R, Dave N, Agrawal B, Baghele A. Correlation between bispectral index, end-tidal anaesthetic gas concentration and difference in inspired–end-tidal oxygen concentration as measures of anaesthetic depth in paediatric patients posted for short surgical procedures. Indian J Anaesth. 2019;63(4):277–83.
- Aranake A, Mashour GA, Avidan MS. Minimum alveolar concentration: ongoing relevance and clinical utility. Anaesthesia. 2013;68(5):512–22.
- Wang J, Zhang L, Huang Q, Wu G, Weng X, Lai Z, et al. Monitoring the end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane for preventing awareness during anesthesia (MEETS-PANDA): a prospective clinical trial. Int J Surg. 2017;41:44–9.
- Yassen KA, Awaad EK, Refaat EK, Soliman NM, Yehia MF. Inhaled desflurane vs. propofol for postoperative sedation guided with patient state index of SEDline in mechanically ventilated liver transplant recipient. J Anesth Clin Res. 2016;7:623–9.
- Gökçek E, Kaydu A, Akdemir MS, Akil F, Akıncı IO. Early postoperative recovery after intracranial surgical procedures. Comparison of the effects of sevoflurane and desflurane. Acta Cir Bras. 2016;31(9):638–44.
- Dilger JP. From individual to population: the minimum alveolar concentration curve. Curr OpinAnesthesiol. 2006;19(4):390–6.
- Katoh T, Ikeda K. The effects of fentanyl on sevoflurane requirements for loss of consciousness and skin incision. Anesthesiology. 1998;88(1):18–24.
- Musialowicz T, Lahtinen P. Current status of EEG-based depth-of- consciousness monitoring during general anesthesia. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2014;4:251–60.
- Jang YE, Kim EH, Lee JH, Kim JT, Kim HS. Usefulness of bispectral index and patient state index during sevoflurane anesthesia in children: A prospective observational study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(30):e29925.
- Chen X, Tang J, White PF, Wender RH, Ma H, Sloninsky A, et al. A comparison of patient state index and bispectral index values during the perioperative period. Anesth Analg. 2002;95(6):1669–74.
- Adesanya AO, Rosero E, Wyrick C, Wall MH, Joshi GP. Assessing the predictive value of the bispectral index vs patient state index on clinical assessment of sedation in postoperative cardiac surgery patients. J Crit Care. 2009;24(3):322–8.
- Sieber TJ, Frei CW, Derighetti M, Feigenwinter P, Leibundgut D, Zbinden AM. Model-based automatic feedback control versus human control of end-tidal isoflurane concentration using low-flow anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2000;85(6):818–25.
- Singaravelu S, Barclay P. Automated control of end-tidal inhalation anaesthetic concentration using the GE Aisys Carestation™. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110(4):561–6.
- Lortat-Jacob B, Billard V, Buschke W, Servin F. Assessing the clinical or pharmaco-economicalbenefit of target controlled Sameeksha A J et al. / Indian Journal of Clinical Anaesthesia 2025;12(3):420–425 425 desflurane delivery in surgical patients using the Zeus® anaesthesia machine. Anaesthesia. 2009;64(11):1229–35.
- Tay S, Weinberg L, Peyton P, Story D, Briedis J. Financial and environmental costs of manual versus automated control of end-tidal gas concentrations. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2013;41:95-101.
- Punjasawadwong Y, Phongchiewboon A, Bunchungmongkol N. Bispectral index for improving anaesthetic delivery and postoperative recovery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(6):CD003843.
- Chaudhuri S, Banerjee S, Chattopadhyay U, Hussain SS. Comparison of recovery times by using bispectral index monitoring versus end-tidal agent concentration monitoring in patients undergoing inhalational general anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2022;66(Suppl 3):S161–S8.
- White PF, Tang J, Ma H, Wender RH, Sloninsky A, Kariger R. Is the patient state analyzer with the PSArray2 a cost-effective alternative to the bispectral index monitor during the perioperative period? Anesth Analg. 2004;99(5):1429–35.
- Purdon PL, Sampson A, Pavone KJ, Brown EN. Clinical electroencephalography for anesthesiologists: part I: background and basic signatures. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(4):937-60.
- Shanker A, Abel JH, Schamberg G, Brown EN. Etiology of burst suppression EEG patterns. Front Psychol. 2021;12:673529.
- Akeju O, Pavone KJ, Westover MB, Vazquez R, Prerau MJ, Harrell PG, et al. A comparison of propofol- and dexmedetomidine-induced electroencephalogram dynamics using spectral and coherence analysis. Anesthesiology. 2014;121(5):978–89.
- Fletcher JP, Morris JG, Little JM, Kershaw LZ. EEG monitoring during carotid endarterectomy. Aust N Z J Surg. 1988;58(4):285–90.
- Kertai MD, Pal N, Palanca BJ, Lin N, Searleman SA, Zhang L, et al. B-Unaware Study Group. Association of perioperative risk factors and cumulative duration of low bispectral index with intermediate-term mortality after cardiac surgery in the B-Unaware Trial. Anesthesiology. 2010;112(5):1116–27.
How to Cite This Article
Vancouver
J SA, Lakshminarasimhaiah G, Sudhir N, Gopalakrishnan R, Basavaraj S, Krishnaswamy P. Comparison of patient state index and end tidal anaesthetic concentration monitoring on recovery profile in desflurane based anaesthesia in neurosurgical population [Internet]. Indian J Clin Anaesth. 2025 [cited 2025 Oct 02];12(3):420-425. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2025.066
APA
J, S. A., Lakshminarasimhaiah, G., Sudhir, N., Gopalakrishnan, R., Basavaraj, S., Krishnaswamy, P. (2025). Comparison of patient state index and end tidal anaesthetic concentration monitoring on recovery profile in desflurane based anaesthesia in neurosurgical population. Indian J Clin Anaesth, 12(3), 420-425. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2025.066
MLA
J, Sameeksha A, Lakshminarasimhaiah, Geetha, Sudhir, Namratha, Gopalakrishnan, Roshika, Basavaraj, Swetha, Krishnaswamy, Pooja. "Comparison of patient state index and end tidal anaesthetic concentration monitoring on recovery profile in desflurane based anaesthesia in neurosurgical population." Indian J Clin Anaesth, vol. 12, no. 3, 2025, pp. 420-425. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2025.066
Chicago
J, S. A., Lakshminarasimhaiah, G., Sudhir, N., Gopalakrishnan, R., Basavaraj, S., Krishnaswamy, P.. "Comparison of patient state index and end tidal anaesthetic concentration monitoring on recovery profile in desflurane based anaesthesia in neurosurgical population." Indian J Clin Anaesth 12, no. 3 (2025): 420-425. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2025.066