• Article highlight
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 23-07-2024

Accepted : 05-09-2024



Article Metrics




Downlaod Files

   


Article Access statistics

Viewed: 206

PDF Downloaded: 62


Get Permission Shah, Nadkarni, Chavda, Patel, and Thomas: Comparative study of endotracheal tube cuff inflation with air versus alkalinized lidocaine on hemodynamic response during extubation


Introduction

Cuffed endotracheal tubes are essential in general anaesthesia for ensuring controlled ventilation. It also decreases the consumption of medical gases, prevent aspiration, reduce pollution of the operating room environment, and maintains the tube midline in the trachea.1, 2, 3, 4 However, cuff inflation, typically with air, can lead to significant hemodynamic stress during extubation, manifesting as tachycardia and hypertension. The incidence of coughing after extubation from general anaesthesia in some cases reaches up to 96%.5

Previous studies have explored various agents, including lidocaine, to mitigate these effects. Alkalinized lidocaine, in particular, may offer enhanced permeability through the cuff membrane, leading to better mucosal anaesthesia and reduced hemodynamic response.

Lidocaine can be administered intravenously, intracuff, topical and through tracheal routes,6 Other drugs can be used are dexmedetomidine,7 fentanyl8 and remifentanil.9 Amongst these, lidocaine is the most widely used drug in anaesthetic set-ups and so it is being frequently used by anaesthetic professionals for decreasing the pressure response during extubation. It has been shown that lidocaine have reduced postoperative sore throat and coughing in 50 -70% cases over other drugs.10, 11, 12

In general anaesthesia ETT cuff are inflated by air which exerts pressure on adjacent mucosa. Monitoring of cuff pressure is usually done by manometer and when pressure is elevated, exerts pressure on adjacent mucosa of trachea leading to decrease blood supply which can lead to serious consequences such as ulcer formation, loss of cilia, inflammation, bleeding, tracheal stenosis and sometimes even tracheo-esophageal fistula.13, 14 Keeping ideal cuff pressure maintained for the entire duration of the surgery is also challenging as it is governed by the anaesthetic gas used such as nitrous oxide, the agent used to inflate the cuff, and the material and type of cuff.15, 16 Nitrous oxide is very commonly used in conjunction with other anaesthetic gases, but it readily diffuses into air-filled cavities such as cuff of ETT leading to a slowly rise in volume of cuff and which in turn increases cuff pressure of ETT, consequently leading to more hemodynamic changes during and post extubation.13, 17

Lignocaine is liquid in nature so it does not allow entry of nitrous oxide into the cuff. It also permeates through the semipermeable membrane of cuff into tracheal mucosa and gives direct anaesthetic effect.18, 19, 20, 21 Making Alkalinised lignocaine with sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) increases the non-ionised form of lignocaine which remarkably increases the permeability of lignocaine through polyvinyl cuff walls by approximately 63 folds.22, 23 Thus, small amount of lignocaine can also provide rapid and prolonged anaesthetic effect over mucosa. So, a randomised study was conducted on endotracheal tube inflated with air compared to cuff inflated with 2% alkalinized lidocaine to observe the attenuation of pressure response during extubation.

Materials and Methods

This Randomised prospective observational study was conducted in the operation theatre of a tertiary health care centre under the department of Anaesthesiology after obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee (SVIEC/UN/MEDI/SRP/JULY/23/128). A total of 40 patients of either sex aged between 18 to 65 years belonging to ASA 1 & 2, posted for elective surgeries, undergoing general anaesthesia were included in this study. Patients on anticonvulsants, known case of hypertension, known allergic to trial drug or not willing to participate were excluded from the study (Figure 1).

Detailed preanaesthetic check-up was carried out a day prior to surgery. General examination, physical and systemic examination and airway assessment were carried out. All routine investigations were done. The procedure was explained and written informed consent was taken in their native language.

Parameters monitored were heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and pulse oximetry (SpO2) recorded at baseline.

The sample size was calculated with the incidence of post operative coughing that was observed in the post-anesthesia care unit after tracheal extubation.5 For this study, with a Type I error rate set at 0.05 and a Type II error rate of 0.2, corresponding to a power of 80% and a 95% confidence interval, a total sample size of 40 patients was determined, with 20 patients allocated to each group. The patients were evenly divided into two groups. Group A had their endotracheal tube (ETT) cuffs inflated with air, while Group L had their ETT cuffs inflated with alkalinized lidocaine. Alkalinized lidocaine was prepared by taking 9cc of 2% lidocaine and adding 1cc of sodium bicarbonate and using approximately 4-5 cc as required to inflate the cuff.

Figure 1

Consort flow diagram

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/313556e1-ee6b-4ce1-a9a6-cb3d9cdea97b/image/e637d124-a890-48c8-88a1-a98b85821585-u100.png

On arrival to operation theatre, intravenous access was taken and crystalloid inj. Ringar Lactate was started. Baseline parameters were recorded. Patient was premedicated with Inj glycopyrrolate 0.004mg/kg IV, Inj ondansetron 0.1mg/kg IV, Inj midazolam 0.02mg/kg IV and Inj tramadol 1mg/kg IV. Patient was then preoxygenated with 100% oxygen via face mask for 5 minutes. General anaesthesia was induced by standard technique of intravenous induction with Inj propofol (2mg/kg) along with Inj succinylcholine (2mg/kg) given to facilitate the intubation, after confirming check ventilation. Trachea was intubated with a cuffed portex endotracheal tube of appropriate size and bilateral air entry was confirmed. Cuff was then inflated either with air (Group A) or with 2% alkalinized lidocaine (Group L) depending on the allocated groups. Maintenance of anaesthesia was done with oxygen and nitrous oxide at 1:1 ratio and isoflurane as an inhalational agent by circle system. Inj atracurium 0.5mg/kg IV was administered as a loading dose and then maintained with 0.1mg/kg IV. Patients were mechanically ventilated with volume Control mode to maintain eucapnia.

Extubation was done at the end of surgery and patients were shifted to post-operative recovery room for post op monitoring. Primary outcomes were monitoring of vitals parameters (HR, SBP, DBP, MAP) was done at 30 minutes after induction, 30 minutes before extubation, after administration of reversal agent, during extubation, at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 15 minutes after extubation. Secondary outcomes were any side effects like nausea, vomiting, sore throat, coughing, or dysphonia observed during study.

Statistical analysis

The data was collected and entered using the Epi-Info version 7.0 and clean-up has been made to check accuracy, consistency, and errors. Errors identified were corrected and finally, the data was transported to SPSS Version 20 for analysis and presented as tabulated form. Numerical variables were demonstrated as mean and standard deviations (SD) while categorical variables were demonstrated as frequency and percentage. For comparison between both the groups, unpaired student-t test was used for numerical variables and for categorical variables, chi-square test was used. A difference of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 20 patients in each group, Group A and Group L, were compared. The demographic data, including age, gender, weight, and ASA grading, were found to be comparable between the two groups (Table 1).

Table 1

Demographic variables of both the groups

Variable

Group A

Mean ± SD

Group L

Mean ± SD

P-value

Age (years)

38.35 ±7.1

48.05 ±13.03

0.058 (NS)

Weight (kg)

59.25 ±8.26

61.2 ±7.11

0.4286 (NS)

Gender

N%

N%

Male

55%

45%

0.7518 (NS)

Female

45%

55%

[i] (*NS– Not significant)

The results indicated that inflating the ETT cuff with air was significantly less effective in reducing heart rate during extubation and at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 15 minutes post-extubation compared to inflation with alkalinized lidocaine. This difference was statistically significant, with a p-value of less than 0.0001 (Table 2).

Table 2

Comparison of heart rate (beats/min)

Time

Group A (Heart rate)

Group L (Heart rate)

t

P-value

Mean ±SD

Mean ±SD

Baseline

79.8 ±8.41

80.3 ±10.06

0.171

0.8655 (NS)

30 min after induction

64.8 ±6.66

68.1 ±7.55

1.466

0.1509 (NS)

30 min before extubation

66.2 ±6.45

67.6 ±7.07

0.654

0.5169 (NS)

After administration of reversal agent

68.1 ±7.18

70.2 ±7.13

0.928

0.3592 (NS)

During extubation

90.7 ±6.69

79.5 ±7.1

-5.134

P < 0.0001 (HS)

2 min after extubation

92.1 ±6.31

81.1 ±6.94

-5.245

P < 0.0001 (HS)

4 min after extubation

92.7 ±5.81

81.3 ±8.47

-4.964

P < 0.0001 (HS)

6 min after extubation

92.8 ±6.88

81.4 ±7.49

-5.013

P < 0.0001 (HS)

8 min after extubation

92.1 ±7.38

81 ±7.75

-4.639

P < 0.0001 (HS)

10 min after extubation

91 ±7.36

81 ±7.44

-4.273

P < 0.0001 (HS)

[i] (*HS-significant & *NS-not significant)

As shown in (Table 3), ETT cuff inflation with air was less effective than alkalinized lidocaine in reducing systolic blood pressure during extubation and at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 15 minutes post-extubation. This difference was statistically significant, with a p-value of less than 0.001.

Table 3

Comparison of systolic blood pressure(mmHg)

Time

Group A (SBP)

Group L (SBP)

t

P-value

Mean ±SD

Mean ±SD

Baseline

120.2 ±7.76

119.8 ±8.1

-0.159

0.8741 (NS)

30 min after induction

108.1 ±7.66

107.7 ±9.21

-0.149

0.8821 (NS)

30 min before extubation

108.3 ±7.57

108.1 ±8.25

-0.080

0.9367 (NS)

After administration of reversal agent

109.4 ±6.02

109.4 ±8.41

0.000

1.0000 (NS)

During extubation

149.5 ±6.55

133.1 ±7.52

-7.354

P < 0.0001 (HS)

2 min after extubation

150.5 ±4.81

133.4 ±7.79

-8.353

P < 0.0001 (HS)

4 min after extubation

150.9 ±5.41

133 ±7.8

-8.433

P < 0.0001 (HS)

6 min after extubation

150.1 ±6.03

132.8 ±7.12

-8.292

P < 0.0001 (HS)

8 min after extubation

148.1 ±4.88

131 ±7.27

-8.734

P < 0.0001 (HS)

10 min after extubation

147.4 ±4.73

130.6 ±7.74

-8.283

P < 0.0001 (HS)

15 min after extubation

146.2 ±4.76

129.6 ±8.45

-7.655

P < 0.0001 (HS)

[i] (*NS- Not significant *HS- Highly significant)

In this study, the use of an endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff filled with 2% alkalinized lidocaine was found to be statistically significantly more effective in controlling diastolic blood pressure during extubation, as well as at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 15 minutes post-extubation, compared to an ETT cuff inflated with air (Table 4, p<0.001). Diastolic blood pressure can be more sensitive to changes in vascular tone and systemic resistance, which might be influenced more significantly by the irritation and discomfort associated with extubation. Lidocaine's anesthetic properties could help mitigate these responses.

Table 4

Comparison of diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)

Time

Group A

Group L

t

P-value

Mean ±SD

Mean ±SD

Baseline

77.8 ±4.72

79.8 ±5.84

1.191

0.2410 (NS)

30 min after induction

70.3 ±3.26

72.1 ±5.33

1.288

0.2054 (NS)

30 min before extubation

69.6 ±3.35

71.3 ±5.04

1.256

0.2167 (NS)

After administration of reversal agent

70.6 ±3.25

72.3 ±5.28

1.226

0.2277 (NS)

During extubation

91.2 ±6.1

81.6 ±5.79

-5.105

P < 0.0001 (HS)

2 min after extubation

92.5 ±6.12

82.5 ±4.58

-5.851

P < 0.0001 (HS)

4 min after extubation

92.3 ±4.78

82.2 ±4.49

-6.887

P < 0.0001 (HS)

6 min after extubation

92.4 ±4.84

81.7 ±4.82

-7.005

P < 0.0001 (HS)

8 min after extubation

92.2 ±5.5

81.3 ±4.27

-7.001

P < 0.0001 (HS)

10 min after extubation

92.1 ±4.7

80.1 ±4.7

-8.074

P < 0.0001 (HS)

15 min after extubation

90.5 ±4.44

78.6 ±5.03

-7.932

P < 0.0001 (HS)

[i] (*NS– Not significant *HS – Highly Significant)

Table 5

Comparison of Mean arterial pressure

Time

Group A (MBP)

Group L(MBP)

t

P-value

Mean ±SD

Mean ±SD

Baseline

91.95 ±5.02

93.05 ±5.15

0.684

0.4981(NS)

30 min after induction

82.95 ±3.82

84 ±5.66

0.688

0.4958(NS)

30 min before extubation

82.65 ±4.23

83.65 ±5.35

0.656

0.5160(NS)

After administration of reversal agent

83.65 ±3.56

84.75 ±5.72

0.735

0.4666(NS)

During extubation

110.05 ±5.53

98.9 ±4.7

-6.871

P < 0.0001 (HS)

2 min after extubation

111.5 ±4.41

99.5 ±4.24

-8.772

P < 0.0001 (HS)

4 min after extubation

111.4 ±3.78

98.95 ±4.88

-9.020

P < 0.0001 (HS)

6 min after extubation

111.05 ±3.72

98.45 ±4.68

-9.425

P < 0.0001 (HS)

8 min after extubation

110.5 ±4.11

97.45 ±4.74

-9.302

P < 0.0001 (HS)

10 min after extubation

110.25 ±3.77

96.55 ±4.68

-10.195

P < 0.0001 (HS)

15 min after extubation

108.8 ±3.76

95.95 ±4.76

-9.474

P < 0.0001 (HS)

[i] (mmHg) (*NS– Not significant *HS – Highly significant)

Mean arterial pressure measurements taken at extubation and at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 15 minutes afterward revealed that the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff inflated with air was significantly less effective than the cuff filled with alkalinized lidocaine in controlling mean arterial pressure (p<0.001) (Table 5). Patients in Group L, who received the alkalinized lidocaine treatment, exhibited notably better hemodynamic stability during and after extubation compared to those in Group A, who had air-filled cuffs (p < 0.0001).

Furthermore, 5 patients in Group A reported coughing and sore throat post-extubation, while no such complaints were observed in Group L. The coughing in Group A was associated with increased tachycardia and hypertension, which were more pronounced in these patients due to the use of air in the ETT cuff.

Discussion

Cuffed endotracheal tubes are used extensively to secure airway in patients undergoing general anaesthesia.5, 13 The lateral pressure exerted by the inflated cuff of ETT can be transmitted to the tracheal mucosa. When the ET cuff pressure becomes greater than tracheal capillary perfusion pressure of 30cmH2O22, 24, 25 it can lead to tracheal ischaemia and complications during emergence such as coughing, agitation and primarily increased hemodynamic stress response.26, 27 This has led to the use of various techniques such as intracuff instillation of drugs such as lidocaine to decrease this response.

With the use of alkalinized lidocaine, the pH of the prepared solution changes from 6.92 to 7.43, increasing the non-ionized fraction of the lidocaine and the cuff acts as a storage for releasing local anaesthetic to the underlying tracheal tissue through the cuff.21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 With the current focus being on “balanced anaesthesia”, N2O is a common conjunct to other inhaled gases. In 1965, Eger & Saidman found that nitrous oxide is 34 times more soluble in blood than inspired nitrogen29 hence can lead to increased diffusion of nitrous oxide into the cuffs. In the study done by Navarro LH, they determined that in the group with air inflated ETT cuff, even though the initial pressure of the cuff was set below the critical pressure of tracheal mucosa of 30cmH2O, after 30 min of administering N2O, the cuff pressure almost equalled to 30cmH2O.23 This may be due to the fact that highly soluble gases dissolving in liquid does not lead to the expansion of the liquid.14

Navarro LH24 conducted a randomised clinical study on 50 patients comparing ETT cuff inflation with 20cmH2O to ETT cuff filled with 2% lidocaine & 8.4% NaHCO3 to attain the same pressure. They observed that pressures in lidocaine filled endotracheal tube cuffs were significantly lower than the air filled cuffs (p<0.05) having lower systolic blood pressure at the time of extubation in lidocaine group (p<0.05)

Another prospective randomised controlled study conducted by Pallavi Gaur & Pravin Ubale13 on 100 patients aged between 18 to 65 years compared ETT cuff inflated with air versus ETT cuff filled with alkalinized lidocaine (2% lidocaine with 7.5% NaHCO3 in the proportion 19:1) and inflated to the pressure required to prevent air leak and measured using pressure manometer. It was seen that volume and pressure measured in the cuff at the end of the surgery were significantly higher in air group as compared to alkalinized lidocaine group (p<0.05) with incidence of coughing and post-operative sore throat being significantly higher in air group which is similar to our study.

In 2022, Biniam Assefa15 conducted a prospective observational cohort study on 56 children aged between 3 to 13 years to compare tracheal tube cuff inflation with air versus alkalinized lidocaine to monitor hemodynamic parameters starting 5 minutes before extubation to 24 hours after extubation of the endotracheal tube. They observed that mean heart rate and systolic blood pressure at 5 minutes after extubation was significantly lower in alkalinized lidocaine group compared to air group with p<0.001. Hence it was concluded that alkalinized lidocaine showed improved hemodynamic stability in children also.

There were two systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Firstly in 2015 when Lam F30 reviewed 19 trials comprising 1566 patients. Incidence of coughing and agitation was compared between alkalinized lidocaine filled cuffs, non-alkalinized lidocaine filled cuffs and control groups. It was seen that both alkalinized & non-alkalinized intracuff lidocaine helps to alleviate emergence phenomena compared to control group with significant hemodynamic stability (Confidence Interval 95%).

The second one was done in 2012 by Rizvanovic N31 with 12 studies involving 1175 participants with age range of 36.71 to 52 years. It was concluded that Intracuff alkalinized lidocaine was associated with less cough compared to Saline group (95% confidence interval) and more effective than air group in decreasing postoperative sore throat & hoarseness (95% confidence interval).

Many Studies have shown that, with lidocaine used in the cuff, patients present lower incidence of bucking at the time of extubation,29 since there is higher tolerance for both tracheal and tracheotomy tubing32 and lower incidence of sore throats.21, 22, 23, 24

In contrast to our study, Budania conducted a randomised study on 104 patients compared the effect of air, saline, anaesthetic gas mixture, or 2% lignocaine for tracheal tube cuff inflation on coughing & laryngotracheal morbidity after tracheal extubation.33 They concluded that the difference in the post-extubation cough response was not significant in different groups.

In our study it was observed that ETT cuff inflated with air (Group A) was not as effective as alkalinized 2% lidocaine (Group L) in controlling vital parameters such as heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure & mean arterial pressure at the time of extubation, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 & 15 minutes after extubation. Incidence of cough and sore throat was also seen in Group A patients.

Recommendation

Cuff inflation with alkalinized lidocaine is very easy to perform, readily available and new emerging trend for smooth recovery from general anaesthesia. It gives further door to various research proposals.

Limitations

There are few limitations of this study: First, the lack of a cuff manometer to measure cuff pressure is major limitation of the study. Second, there is no placebo saline group so comparison of Lidocaine and air group cannot be done with saline group. Third, we have included only normotensive patients and the responses may not reflect the effectiveness and safety in hypertensives in whom attenuation of intubation response is more difficult. As this study is conducted in single hospital, its generalisability is limited.

Conclusion

Inflation of the endotracheal tube cuff with alkalinized lidocaine significantly attenuates hemodynamic stress during extubation compared to air, suggesting a potential improvement in patient safety.

Source of Funding

There is no source of funding.

Conflict of Interest   

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge all the anaesthetic consultants of our department and nursing staff of the operation theatre and recovery room. We also acknowledge Institutional Ethical Committee for approval of the study and patients who gave consent for the enrolment in the study.

References

1 

RS Litman LG Maxwell Cuffed versus uncuffed endotracheal tubes in pediatric anesthesia: the debate should finally endAnesthesiology201311835001

2 

T Engelhardt G Johnston MM Kumar Comparison of cuffed, uncuffed tracheal tubes and laryngeal mask airways in low flow pressure controlled ventilation in childrenPaediatr Anaesth20061621403

3 

S Eschertzhuber B Salgo A Schmitz W Roth A Frotzler CH Keller Cuffed endotracheal tubes in children reduce sevoflurane and medical gas consumption and related costsActa Anaesthesiol Scand20105478558

4 

HH Khine DH Corddry RG Kettrick TM Martin JJ Mccloskey JB Rose Comparison of cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes in young children during general anesthesiaAnesthesiology199786362731

5 

B Assefa H Samuel F Fen6e T Daniel A Hika B Aberra Effect of tracheal tube cuff inflation with alkalinized lidocaine versus air on hemodynamic responses during extubation and post-operative airway morbidities in children: prospective observational cohort study, EthiopiaBMC Anesthesiol2022221337

6 

Y Tanaka T Nakayama M Nishimori Y Sato H Furuya Lidocaine for preventing postoperative sore throatCochrane Database Syst Rev20093CD004081

7 

H Liu C Zhou J Ji Effects of using different dose of dexmedetomidine during tracheal extubation for patients with parotidectomy after general anesthesiaShanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue201625336872

8 

Y Inoue K Koga T Sata A Shigematsu Effects of fentanyl on emergence characteristics from anesthesia in adult cervical spine surgery: a comparison of fentanyl-based and sevoflurane-based anesthesiaJ Anesth2005191126

9 

HR Cho HK Kim SH Baek KY Jung The effect of remifentanil infusion on coughing during emergence from general anesthesia with desfluraneKorean J Anesthesiol20085566704

10 

H Yukioka M Hayashi T Terai M Fujimori Intravenous lidocaine as a suppressant of coughing during tracheal intubation in elderly patientsAnesth Analg199377230912

11 

H Souissi Y Fréchette A Murza MH Masse É Marsault P Sarret Intracuff 160 mg alkalinized lidocaine reduces cough upon emergence from N2O-free general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trialCan J Anaesth201663786270

12 

SC Minogue J Ralph MJ Lampa Laryngotracheal topicalization with lidocaine before intubation decreases the incidence of coughing on emergence from general anesthesiaAnesth Analg200499412537Anesthesia & Analgesia

13 

P Gaur P Ubale P Khadanga Efficacy and Safety of Using Air Versus Alkalinized 2% Lignocaine for Inflating Endotracheal Tube Cuff and Its Pressure Effects on Incidence of Postoperative Coughing and Sore ThroatAnesth Essays Res2017114105763

14 

S Malhotra M Singh N Malhotra Tracheal Morbidity Following Tracheal Intubation: Comparison of Air, Saline and Lignocaine used for Inflating CuffJ Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol20072321637

15 

P Dobrin T Canfield Cuffed endotracheal tubes: mucosal pressures and tracheal wall blood flowAm J Surg197713355628

16 

X Wang J Zhang G Zhu S Cai Q Zhang M Duan Effect of cuff inflation with lidocaine, saline, and air on tracheal tube cuff pressure during laparoscopic resection of colorectal neoplasms: a randomized clinical trialBMC Anesthesiol2024241216

17 

E Nasiri R Mohamadpoor Y Mortazavi M Khorrami A comparison change in endotracheal tube cuff pressure between air and Lidocaine and N2O with O2 cuff inflation during general anesthesiaJ Gorgan Univ Med Sci200462329

18 

SM Rao A Taggu Snigdha V Kumar Instillation of 4% lidocaine versus air in the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff to evaluate post intubation morbidity-a randomized double blind studyJ Anesthesiol Clin Sci20132119

19 

C Fagan HP Frizelle J Laffey V Hannon M Carey The Effects of Intracuff Lidocaine on Endotracheal-Tube-Induced Emergence Phenomena After General AnesthesiaAnesth Analg20009112015

20 

JM Sconzo JC Moscicki CA Difazio In vitro diffusion of lidocaine across endotracheal tube cuffsReg Anesth19901513740

21 

CJ Huang MC Tsai CT Chen CR Cheng KH Wu TT Wei In vitro diffusion of lidocaine across endotracheal tube cuffsCan J Anesth1999461826

22 

Smf Soares V M Arantes M P Modolo The effects of tracheal tube cuffs filled with air, saline or alkalinized lidocaine on haemodynamic changes and laryngotracheal morbidity in children: a randomised, controlled trialAnaesthesia2017724496503

23 

HA Soltani O Aghadavoudi The effect of different lidocaine application methods on postoperative cough and sore throatJ Clin Anesth2002141158

24 

LHC Navarro JRC Braz G Nakamura RME Lima FdPE Silva NSP Módolo Effectiveness and safety of endotracheal tube cuffs filled with air versus filled with alkalinized lidocaine: a randomized clinical trialSao Paulo Med J200712563228

25 

VV Jaichandran Nl Angayarkanni C Karunakaran IM Bhanulakshmi V Jagadeesh Diffusion of Lidocaine buffered to an optimal pH across the Endotracheal tube cuff An in- Vitro studyIndian J Anaesth200852553640

26 

CJ Huang YW Hsu CC Chen YP Ko RH Rau KH Wu Prevenion of coughing induced by endotracheal tube during emergence from general anesthesia--a comparison between three different regimens of lidocaine filled in the endotracheal tube cuffActa Anaesthesiol Sin1998362816

27 

JP Estebe M Genili PL Corre G Dollo F Chevanne C Ecoffey Alkalinization of intracuff lidocaine: efficacy and safetyAnesth Analg20051015153641

28 

NE Porter V Sidou J Husson Postoperative sore throat: incidence and severity after the use of lidocaine, saline, or air to inflate the endotracheal tube cuffAANA J19996714952

29 

W Hirota W Kobayashi K Igarashi Y Yagihashi H Kimura J Strupish Lidocaine added to a tracheostomy tube cuff reduces tube discomfortCan J Anaesth20004754124

30 

F Lam YC Lin HC Tsai TL Chen KW Tam CY Chen Effect of Intracuff Lidocaine on Postopera6ve Sore Throat and the Emergence Phenomenon: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled TrialsPLoS One2015108e0136184

31 

N Rizvanović S Čaušević N Hrnčić H Hatibović Effect of intracuff alkalinized 2% lidocaine on endotracheal tube cuff pressure and postoperative throat symptoms in anaesthesia maintained by nitrous oxideMed Glas (Zenica)2019161712

32 

F Altintas P Bozkurt G Kaya G Akkan Lidocaine 10% in the endotracheal tube cuff: blood concentrations, haemodynamic and clinical effectsEur J Anaesthesiol200017743642

33 

LS Budania V Chamala M Rao S Virmani KA Goyal K Nanda Effect of air, anesthetic gas mixture, saline, or 2% lignocaine used for tracheal tube cuff inflation on coughing and laryngotracheal morbidity after tracheal extubationJ Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol201834338691



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.