• Article highlight
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 11-04-2022

Accepted : 12-09-2022



Article Metrics




Downlaod Files

   


Article Access statistics

Viewed: 487

PDF Downloaded: 332


Get Permission Sundrani, Raghuveer, Sahare, Shah, and Lalwani: Interventions required and outcome in pregnancy induced hypertension patients in Intensive Care Unit: An observational study


Introduction

Hypertension is the most common medical disorder of pregnancy, affecting 6% to 10% pregnancies. It is a leading cause of maternal mortality, together with hemorrhage it accounts for about one half of all maternal deaths worldwide and significant neonatal complications. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy encompass a range of conditions- chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, preeclampsia superimposed on chronic hypertension and eclampsia. It is difficult to differentiate because clinical presentation is often similar despite complex differences in their underlying pathophysiology and prognoses.

Preeclampsia usually manifests after 20 weeks of gestation with hypertension and proteinuria, where hypertension is defined as systolic blood pressure of 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure of 90 mmHg on at least two occasions and at least 4-6 hours apart in a woman known to be normotensive beforehand. The diagnosis of preeclampsia should also be considered in the absence of proteinuria when any of the following signs or symptoms of end organ involvement are present: persistent epigastric or right upper quadrant pain, persistent cerebral symptoms, fetal growth restriction, thrombocytopenia or elevated liver enzymes. HELLP syndrome refers to development of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelet count in a woman with preeclampsia. The term eclampsia is used when central nervous system involvement results in the new onset of seizures in a woman with preeclampsia. Eclampsia can occur suddenly at any point in the puerperium; however, most seizures occur intrapartum or within first 48 hours after delivery.

Risk factors for pregnancy induced hypertension include extremes of maternal age, nulliparity, multiple gestation, molar pregnancy, previous history of preeclampsia or eclampsia, preexisting hypertension, obesity, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal disease, urban or rural domicile, availability and utilization of health facilities. Major maternal complications include pulmonary aspiration, pulmonary edema, cerebrovascular accident, venous thromboembolism, acute renal failure, liver failure, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), sepsis, cardiopulmonary arrest and death. Perinatal complications include fetal growth restriction, perinatal asphyxia, iatrogenic prematurity, stillbirths, preterm delivery and neonatal mortality.

Quite often, further care of these women in the ICU becomes necessary for the treatment of preeclampsia/eclampsia and its complications. Initial management includes protecting the airway, breathing adequacy and circulation. Other measures include hemodynamic monitoring, use of intravenous fluids, blood transfusion, plasma expanders, antibiotics, control of seizures and blood pressure. Oxygen supplementation to improve the oxygen saturation, assisted ventilation, respiratory support is commonly required. The outcomes vary because of the different severity of complications associated with preeclampsia/eclampsia. It may be necessary, therefore, to evaluate the management and outcome of these patients. Though pregnancy and labor are considered as physiological processes, the potential for catastrophic complications is constant and may develop within minutes requiring critical care.

In our study, we aim to determine the characteristics, diagnoses, interventions and outcome of 70 obstetric patients with pregnancy induced hypertension admitted in our Critical care unit (CCU).

Materials and Methods

It was a prospective, observational study conducted in 70 obstetric patients diagnosed with PIH who got admitted to the CCU in Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care at Pt. J.N.M. Medical College & Dr. B.R.A.M. Hospital, Raipur (C.G.) after approval from the Institutional Scientific and Ethics Committee from November 2020 to October 2021, after meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Design of study

Observational, prospective study.

Study location

Critical care unit, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Medical College and Dr. B. R. A. M. Hospital, Raipur.

Research duration

November 2020 to October 2021.

Study population

All patients with PIH getting admitted to the ICU were enrolled for the study.

Sample size

70.

Sample size calculation

According to the records of our institutional ICU admissions over the last one year, the sample size has been calculated accordingly as follows:

Sample size determined using the finite population corrective factor

n =n₀N/n₀+(N-1)

p±z p1-pn N-nN-1

n= Z π(1- π)/e

n =n₀N/n₀+(N-1)

After including the 10% dropouts and exclusion criteria, the sample size is 70.

Inclusion criteria

Females with Pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) admitted to ICU.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Non eclamptic causes of fits, including hysterical causes and epilepsy

  2. Patients having chronic hypertension

  3. History of pre-existing liver & kidney disease

  4. Haematological abnormalities

  5. Structural or functional cardiac problems

  6. Sickle cell disease or trait

The record of the ICU of the institution was taken to identify all women with PIH who got admitted during antenatal period and delivery or puerperium (restricted to 6 weeks postpartum) during the study duration. The subjects were divided into four groups - Group 1: Severe preeclampsia without HELLP syndrome, Group 2: Eclampsia without HELLP syndrome, Group 3: Eclampsia with HELLP syndrome, Group 4: HELLP syndrome without eclampsia. For each eligible patients for the study, the following information was collected on a data collection sheet: Socio demographic characteristics namely, age, parity, booking status, marital status, educational status, place of delivery, gestational age at the time of diagnosis, indication for ICU admission and timing of admission to ICU (antepartum or postpartum).

On ICU admission, the parameters recorded were - indication of patient admission, gestational age, obstetric and menstrual history, duration of complications, therapeutic interventions during ICU admission, maternal outcome - mortality or transfer out of the unit and foetal outcome -IUGR/term/preterm, Apgar score and follow up till 7th post-natal day. Laboratory monitoring of patients included complete blood count, liver function tests, coagulation profile, renal function tests, arterial blood gas analysis (ABG), imaging (Chest X-ray/ CT, neuro-CT/ MRI), ECG, 2D Echo, USG abdomen. Interventions required in the ICU were hemodynamic monitoring (heart rate, non-invasive blood pressure, respiratory rate, SpO2), mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, transfusion of blood and its products and use of vasoactive drugs. The frequency of maternal complications like pulmonary edema, renal impairment, HELLP syndrome, sepsis, postpartum haemorrhage, aspiration, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), postpartum cardiomyopathy and neurological deficits were noted. Maternal follow-up up to 6 weeks postpartum was done.

The statistical analysis was carried out using IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) statistical version 21. The analysis includes frequency table, bar, pie chart, association of variables based on Chi-square, odd ratio, incidence with 95% confidence interval. All quantitative variables were estimated using measures of central location (mean and median) and measures of dispersion (standard deviation). For normally distributed data, Mean was compared using independent t-test (for two groups) ANOVA (for two or more groups). For not normally distributed data, Median was compared using Mann Whitney U test (for two groups). For relationship, Pearson Correlation method was used. Non parametric Chi square test was used to find association between variables.

Result

It was observed that 68.57% (n=48) of our study population were diagnosed with severe preeclampsia alone (Group 1), while 22.86% (n=16) of them were diagnosed with eclampsia (Group 2) (Table 1). 77.14% (n=54) of the patients belonged to the age group of 21-30 years, while 17.14% (n=12) were less than 20 years of age and 5.71% (n=5) were more than 30 years of age. 74.29% (n=52) of the women were nulliparous and the remaining were multiparous. 87.14% (n=61) of the women had unregistered status and 12.86% (n=9) were booked from the initial time of pregnancy.

30% (n=21) of the patients in our study had not completed 37 weeks of gestation, while 65.71% (n=46) were appropriate for the weeks of gestation. 7.14% (n=5) had full term normal vaginal delivery (FTNVD), 8.57% (n=6) patients had preterm normal vaginal delivery (PTNVD) while 91.43% (n=64) had lower segment caesarean section (LSCS). It was seen that 85.71% (n=60) women were admitted postpartum to the ICU and 14.29% (n=10) women were admitted ante partum to the ICU.

It was seen that blood pressure was raised among all the study groups and this increase is statistically significant with a P value of 0.04 and 0.01 for systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure respectively (Table 2). It was also noticed that total bilirubin (p<0.0036), SGOT (p<0.008), SGPT (p<0.001) were statistically significant in Group 1 and Group 3 which may be attributed to development of HELLP syndrome.

42.86% (n=30) patients required transfusion of blood products, 8.57% (n=6) required mechanical ventilation, 4.29% (n=3) required vasoactive drugs and 1.43% (n=1) needed renal replacement therapy (Table 3). Most common maternal complications observed were pulmonary edema (n=2) and HELLP syndrome (n=7, p value <0.001) in Group 1 and Group 3. Overall, mortality was 8.57% (n=6) and the remaining 91.42% (n=64) were discharged (Table 4). Duration of ICU stay was less than 5 days in 56 patients and more than 5 days in the remaining patients.

Low birth weight babies (n=18), preterm babies (n=12) and intrauterine growth retardation (n=3) was more among patients with severe preeclampsia and very low birth weight babies were more among eclamptic patients (n=4). Apgar score at 7 min was significantly associated with maternal diagnosis (p=0.027).

Table 1

Distribution of the patients according to diagnosis

Study groups

N

%

Group 1 (Pre-eclampsia without HELLP syndrome)

48

68.57

Group 2 (Eclampsia without HELLP syndrome)

16

22.86

Group 3 (Eclampsia with HELLP syndrome)

5

7.14

Group 4 (HELLP syndrome without eclampsia)

1

1.43

Total

70

100

Table 2

Comparison of BP among various groups

BP (mmHg)

SBP

DBP

Group 1 (N=48)

157.08±9.88

102.08±7.13

Group 2 (N=16)

147.5±24.35

108.75±18.07

Group 3 (N=5)

164±16.73

104±15.16

Group 4 (N=1)

100

70

P value

0.04 S

0.01 S

Table 3

Distribution of patients according to therapeutic interventions

Therapeutic interventions

N

%

Mechanical ventilation

6

8.57

Renal replacement therapy

1

1.43

Transfusion of blood products

30

42.86

Vasoactive drugs

3

4.29

Table 4

Distribution of patients according to maternal outcome

Maternal outcome

Discharge

Mortality

Total

Group 1 (N=48)

44(68.75%)

4(66.67%)

48(68.57%)

Group 2 (N=16)

15(23.44%)

1(16.67%)

16(22.86%)

Group 3 (N=5)

4(6.25%)

1(16.67%)

5(7.14%)

Group 4 (N=1)

1(1.56%)

0(0%)

1(1.43%)

Total

64(100%)

6(100%)

70 (100%)

[i] Chi square value=1.04, P=0.79 NS

Discussion

It was seen that majority of our study population were diagnosed with severe preeclampsia (68.57%) followed by eclampsia (22.86%) and the findings were similar to the studies done by Lapinsky SE et al,1 Singh K et al,2 Aabidha PM et al,3 Seyom E et al.4 Studies conducted by Leung NYW et al,5 Aabidha PM et al,3 Barbosa IRC et al6 showed that older age group was a risk factor for adverse outcomes. In our study most of them belonged to age group of 21-30 years (77.14%) with 7.41% mortality, however there was no significant association of age with maternal outcome. It was observed that most of our study population was nulliparous (74.29%) with higher incidence of ICU admission and complications. Our findings can be compared with the studies of Aali BS et al,7 Agida ET et al,8 Imarengiaye et al,9 Sailaja K et al.10

Studies done by Imarengiaye et al,9 Aabidha PM et al,3 Ozumba BC et al,11 Agida et al (2010)8 showed that women with unregistered status had increased risk of complications and mortality. Majority of our study population were appropriate for gestational age (65.71%). 91.43% patients underwent lower segment caesarean section which was similar to that of Agida ET et al8 and Imarengiaye et al.9

It was evident from our study that both systolic and diastolic blood pressure was statistically significant (P value 0.04 and 0.01 respectively) which was similar to the study conducted by Seyom E et al.4 It was observed from our study that 42.86% of the patients required transfusion of blood products, 8.57% required mechanical ventilation, 4.29% required vasoactive drugs and 1.43% needed renal replacement therapy. Imarengiaye et al9 observed that mechanical ventilatory support and advanced monitoring were the major interventions in their study. In the study conducted by Sailaja K et al,10 54.9% of patients were mechanically ventilated, blood products were transfused in the ICU in 42 patients (46%), twenty patients (22%) had unstable hemodynamics requiring vasopressor support and had significantly high risk for mortality (p=0.000). Twenty patients (22%) developed renal failure and nine of them underwent dialysis among which six (6.6%) died and three patients were discharged. Leung NYW et al5 showed that majority of their patients required invasive mechanical ventilation.

Gupta S et al12 noted that 91.66% patients required inotropic support and 70.83% required ventilatory support. In the study conducted by Ozcelik M et al,13 the most common intervention required was mechanical ventilation (66.7% in antepartum patients and 43.8% in postpartum patients) followed by transfusion of blood derivatives. It was observed that frequency of requirement of mechanical ventilation was lower, but there was high mortality rate (12.5%) among patients admitted postpartum. The study conducted by Ozumba BC et al11 showed that oxygen supplementation, blood transfusion, assisted ventilation and respiratory support were the interventions required. In the study conducted by Ramachandra Bhat PB et al,14 63% of the study patients needed mechanical ventilation and the most frequent indications were acute respiratory failure (44%) and hemodynamic failure (37%).

Pulmonary edema and HELLP syndrome were the most common complications in our study population. It was supported by studies of Zuberi NF et al,15 Aali BS et al7 Tufnell DJ et al16 and Imarengiaye et al.9 Mortality was 8.57% in our study. The studies conducted by Sailaja K et al10 showed mortality rate of 9.9%, Gupta S et al12 showed 41.67%, Ozcelik M et al13 showed 12.5%.

The incidence of very low birth weight, low birth weight, preterm and intrauterine growth restriction of our study was supported by inferences from Aali BS et al,7 Bridwell M et al17 and Lugobe HM et al.18 As noted in our study, 85.71% women were admitted postpartum to the ICU and 14.29% women were admitted antepartum to the ICU. In the study conducted by Ozcelik M et al,13 most antepartum patients admitted to ICU were primiparous (88.8%), while most patients admitted postpartum were multiparous (64.6%).

It can be seen from our study; that 80% of the patients had ICU stay for less than 5 days, 17.14% had ICU stay between 6-10 days and 2.86% had ICU duration of >10 days. Sailaja K et al10 observed that the mean hospital stay was 10.1 days in their study. In the study conducted by Gupta S et al,12 the mean duration of ICU stay was less due to higher mortality rates.

The limitation of our study was a small sample size and loss to follow up of the patients.

Conclusion

From our study, it was observed that preeclampsia, nulliparity, unbooked status, and lower segment cesarean section were prevalent among the subjects. Most common intervention required was transfusion of blood products. Pulmonary edema and HELLP syndrome were the most common complications. Overall mortality was low. The incidence of low birth weight, IUGR and preterm neonates was higher among those with eclampsia. Neonatal mortality was more in severe preeclampsia patients with term gestation.

Source of Funding and Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

SE Lapinsky K Kruczynski GR Seaward D Farine RF Grossman Obstetric critical careCan J Anaesth19974433259

2 

K Singh A Rani S Parkash Outcome of obstetric patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a one year retrospectiveBMR J20141215

3 

PM Aabidha AG Cherian E Paul J Helan Maternal and fetal outcome in pre-eclampsia in a secondary care hospitalJ Family Med Prim Care20154225760

4 

E Seyom M Abera M Tesfaye N Fentahun Maternal and fetal outcome of pregnancy related hypertension in Mettu Karl Referral Hospital, EthiopiaJ Ovarian Res2015810

5 

NYW Leung ACW Lau KKC Chan WW Yan Clinical characteristics and outcomes of obstetric patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: a 10-year retrospective reviewHong Kong Med J2010161825

6 

IRC Barbosa WBM Silva GSG Cerqueira NF Novo FA Almeida JLVG Novo Maternal and fetal outcome in women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: the impact of prenatal careTher Adv Cardiovasc Dis2015941406

7 

BS Aali J Ghafoorian SM Alizadeh Severe preeclampsia and eclampsia: complications and outcomesMed Sci Monit20041041637

8 

ET Agida BI Adeka KA Jibril Pregnancy outcome in eclamptics at the University of Abuja Teaching Hospital, Gwagwalada, Abuja: a 3 year reviewNiger J Clin Pract20101343948

9 

CO Imarengiaye TO Isesele Intensive Care Management and Outcome of women with hypertensive diseases of pregnancyNiger Med J20155653337

10 

B Sailaja MK Renuka Critically Ill Obstetric Admissions to an Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Analysis from a Tertiary Care University Hospital in South IndiaIndian J Crit Care Med20192327882

11 

BC Ozumba LO Ajah VO Obi UA Umeh JT Enebe KC Obioha Pattern and outcome of obstetric admissions into the intensive care unit of a Southeast Nigerian HospitalIndian J Crit Care Med2018221169

12 

S Gupta U Naithani V Doshi V Bhargava VS Bhavani Obstetric critical care: A prospective analysis of clinical characteristics, predictability, and fetomaternal outcome in a new dedicated obstetric intensive care unitIndian J Anaesth201155214653

13 

M Ozcelik S Turhan O Bermede AA Yilmaz N Unal MK Bayar Outcomes of Antepartum and Postpartum Obstetric Admissions to the Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary University Hospital: An 8-Year ReviewTurk J Anaesthesiol Reanim20174553039

14 

PBR Bhat MH Navada SV Rao G Nagarathna Evaluation of obstetric admissions to intensive care unit of a tertiary referral center in coastal IndiaIndian J Crit Care Med2013171347

15 

NF Zuberi K Arif FM Khan JA Pal A comparison of Severe Preeclampsia/Eclampsia in patients with and without HELLP SyndromeJ Pak Med Assoc19984822932

16 

DJ Tuffnell D Jankowicz SW Lindow G Lyons GC Mason IF Russell Outcomes of severe pre-eclampsia/eclampsiaInt J Obstet Gynaecol200511287580

17 

M Bridwell E Handzel M Hynes RJ Louis D Fitter C Hogue Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and maternal and neonatal outcomes in Haiti: the importance of surveillance and data collectionBMC Pregnancy Childbirth201919208

18 

HM Lugobe R Muhindo M Kayondo I Wilkinson DC Agaba C Mceniery Risks of adverse perinatal and maternal outcomes among women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in southwestern UgandaPLoS ONE20201510e0241207



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.