• Article highlight
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article Metrics




Downlaod Files

   


Article Access statistics

Viewed: 811

PDF Downloaded: 751


Get Permission Makker, Mehra, and Khanna: Comparison of fentanyl, clonidine and nalbuphine for attenuation of pressor response during endotracheal intubation under general anaesthesia


Introduction

Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation are associated with stressful stimuli that provoke tachycardia, hypertension, arrhythmias due to increased sympathoadrenal activity1 which may be detrimental in patients with cardiovascular disease, congestive heart failure (CHF), geriatric population and cerebral haemorrhage.

To blunt this pressor response various drug regimens have been tried including opioids, barbiturates, benzodiazapines, beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, vasodialators but each drug has its own shortcoming2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Clonidine an alpha 2 adrenergic agonist causes an increase in cardiac baroreceptor reflex sensitivity and also decreases the sympathetic nervous system outflow from CNS to peripheral tissues and has been used for attenuation of pressor response.8, 9

Fentanyl, a synthetic narcotic analgesic, has rapid onset and short duration of action which is a routinely used for intravenous analgesia. It has proved to be very effective to control short term hemodynamic change.10 Nalbuphine an agonist antagonist opioid which acts on mu, kappa and delta receptors is used to blunt hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation due to its properties of providing cardiovascular stability, longer analgesia and no respiratory depression.11, 12, 13 These drugs have been studied and compared individually and amongst each other but have never been studied together in similar set of patients. The purpose of this study was to compare Fentanyl, Nalbuphine and Clonidine for attenuation of pressor response due to laryngoscopy and intubation.

Materials and Methods

A prospective study was done involving 90 adult patients of age group 18-50 years, ASA grade 1 and 2, Mallampati grade 1 and 2 who were posted for surgery under general anaesthesia. Research proposal was submitted to and approved by ethical committee. A thorough pre-anaesthetic evaluation was done, after written informed consent. Pregnant patients, patients having history of cardiovascular, renal or hepatic disease; allergy to opioids and in whom difficult intubation was anticipated, were excluded from the study.

Patients were randomly distributed into 3 groups (30 each) by computerized random allocation. Study drugs were given 5 minutes prior to laryngoscopy, Fentanyl 2.0 mcg/kg (Group F), Clonidine 2.0 mcg/kg (Group C), Nalbuphine 0.2 mg/kg (Group N). All standard ASA monitors were attached and continuously monitored. Intravenous Inj. midazolam 2mg and Inj. glycopyrrolate in dose of 0.02mg/kg was given as premedicants. After preoxygenation with 100% oxygen, induction was done with Inj. Propofol (2mg/kg). Inj. Vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg i.v was used to facilitate intubation. oxygen and nitrous oxide in ratio of 40:60, isoflurane (0.5-1.5%) and intermittent Vecuronium was used for maintainance of anaesthesia. For first 10 minutes post intubation no other drug or surgical stimulus was given to the patients. In patients where laryngoscopy time was more than 30 seconds or in whom a second attempt was required were excluded.

Heart rate, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were noted at the time intervals starting with baseline parameters (BL), during intubation (Ti) and then at one minute (T1), three minutes (T3), five minutes (T5) and ten minutes (T10) after intubation. After recording the parameters at the above mentioned intervals, surgery was started. Sample size of 30 in each group was calculated on basis of pilot study. Data was analysed using SPSS v21. Categorical data was represented as frequencies & percentages. Continuous data was represented as mean & standard deviation. Chi square test was used as test of significance for categorical data. Anova test was used as test of significance for comparison of means between three groups. P value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Line diagrams were drawn to represent the trend over a period of time.

Results

There was no statistical difference among the three groups with respect to the demographic variables (age, weight and gender) of patients. (Table 1)

During intubation(Ti) maximum change in heart rate was seen in group F (Fentanyl group, % change from baseline +17.44%) whereas group C (Clonidine group) showed decrease in heart rate (- 4.2%) while group N (Nalbuphine) group had an increase of 14.8%. This difference was statistically significant between the three groups. At 1 minute (T1) and 3 minutes (T3) after intubation there was increase in HR in group F (+15.9 and +6.4) and group N (+13.4% and +5.7%), with more increase in group F, whereas in group C there was decrease in HR (-5.2% and -8.2%). There was statistical difference between F and C, C and N while there was no statistical difference between F and N. At 5 minutes after intubation (T5) there was decrease in HR in all the groups with maximum decrease in group C (-8.5%). This was statistically significant difference among the groups. At 10 min after intubation (T10) there was decrease in HR in all the groups with more decrease in groups C and N while it was less in group F (-5.3%). This was statistically non significant among the groups. (Table 2, Table 3)

At Ti maximum increase in SBP was in group F (+10.4%) while in group C there was decrease in SBP (-4.3%). This was statistically significant between F and C, C and N but not between F and N. At T1 and T3 maximum increase in SBP was in group F while there was decrease in SBP in group C. This was statistically significant among F and C, C and N but not between F and N. At T5 there was increase in SBP in groups F and N with more increase in group F while there was marked decrease in group C (-18.7%). The changes were statistically significant among all the groups. At T10 there was decrease in SBP in all the groups with more decrease in group C. This was also statistically significant among all the groups. (Table 4, Table 5)

At Ti there was increase in DBP in F and C groups with maximum increase in group F. (12,3%). There was slight decrease in group C. This was statistically significant between F and N, C and N but not between F and C. At T1 and T3 there was increase in DBP in group F and N with more increase in group F while there was decrease in group C. This was statistically significant among group F and C, C and N but not between F and N (at T1) while at T3 this was statistically significant among all the groups. At T 5 there was increase in DBP in group F & N while decrease in group C. This was statistically significant among all the groups. At T10 there was decrease in DBP in all the three groups. Maximum decrease was seen in group C (-15.3%) This was statistically significant between group F & C and F & N while not significant between C & N. (Table 6, Table 7)

Table 1

Demographic data

Group F (n=30)

Group C (n=30)

Group N (n=30)

P value

Age, years (Mean ± SD)

46.667 ± 5.46

46.60 ± 4.47

46.533 ± 5.12

0.995 (NS)

Weight, kgs (Mean ± SD)

57.667 ± 6.22

57.667 ± 6.22

57.667 ± 6.22

1.000 (NS)

Female/Male (n)

21/9

19/11

16/14

0.407 (NS)

Table 2

Heart Rate (HR) at different time intervals

Time

Group

n

Mean

SD

P value

Post HOC tests P value

BL

Fentanyl

30

81.467

10.1463

0.360

F&C = 0.342

Clonidine

30

83.567

6.3717

F&N = 0.162

Nalbuphine

30

84.567

8.6091

C&N = 0.650

Ti

Fentanyl

30

95.667

10.3854

0.001

F&C = 0.001

Clonidine

30

80.033

6.3869

F&N = 0.002

Nalbuphine

30

97.067

9.3379

C&N = 0.001

T1

Fentanyl

30

94.666

8.8565

0.001

F&C = 0.001

Clonidine

30

79.200

6.5517

F&N = 0.549

Nalbuphine

30

95.900

11.0514

C&N = 0.001

T3

Fentanyl

30

86.667

8.8759

0.001

F&C = 0.001

Clonidine

30

76.667

7.1647

F&N = 0.200

Nalbuphine

30

89.433

8.7402

C&N = 0.001

T5

Fentanyl

30

78.633

7.7035

0.001

F&C = 0.001

Clonidine

30

76.433

6.2790

F&N = 0.017

Nalbuphine

30

83.133

7.4080

C&N = 0.001

T10

Fentanyl

30

77.100

10.2800

0.862

F&C =0.608

Clonidine

30

75.933

7.2347

F&N = 0.918

Nalbuphine

30

77.867

8.5167

C&N = 0.681

Table 3

Percentage change from baseline in HR at different time intervals

Time

Group F

% change

Group C

% change

Group N

% Change

P value

Baseline

81.46

83.56

84.56

0.360

Ti

95.66

+17.44

80.03

-4.2

97.06

+14.8

0.001

T1

94.66

+15.9

79.20

-5.2

95.90

+13.4

0.001

T3

86.66

+6.4

76.66

-8.2

89.43

+5.7

0.001

T5

78.63

-3.5

76.43

-8.5

83.13

-1.7

0.001

T10

77.10

-5.3

75.93

-9.1

77.86

-7.9

0.862

Table 4

Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at different time intervals

Time

Groups

n

Mean

SD

P value

Post HOC tests P value

BL

Fentanyl

30

121.433

12.0650

0.145

F&C = 0.073

Clonidine

30

125.600

5.9283

F&N = 0.839

Nalbuphine

30

121.900

7.5171

C&N = 0.111

Ti

Fentanyl

30

134.033

11.8307

0.001

F&C = 0.001

Clonidine

30

120.133

9.2726

F&N = 0.621

Nalbuphine

30

133.467

8.2323

C&N = 0.001

T1

Fentanyl

30

133.767

8.7914

0.001

F&C = 0.001

Clonidine

30

116.600

10.7530

F&N = 0.898

Nalbuphine

30

132.767

7.3284

C&N = 0.001

T3

Fentanyl

30

132.433

7.2952

0.001

F&C = 0.001

Clonidine

30

112.567

10.4640

F&N = 0.659

Nalbuphine

30

131.500

6.1012

C&N = 0.001

T5

Fentanyl

30

131.933

5.5518

0.001

F&C = 0.001

Clonidine

30

102.100

14.7235

F&N = 0.038

Nalbuphine

30

126.733

5.0236

C&N = 0.001

T10

Fentanyl

30

114.167

12.3291

0.001

F&C = 0.001

Clonidine

30

101.667

6.4560

F&N = 0.001

Nalbuphine

30

121.567

6.5162

C&N = 0.001

Table 5

Percentage change from baseline in (SBP) at different time intervals

Time

Group F

% change from basal value

Group C

% change from basal value

Group N

% change

P value

Baseline

121.43

125.60

121.90

0.145

Ti

134.03

+10.4

120.13

-4.3

133.46

+9.5

0.001

T1

133.76

+10.1

116.60

-7.1

132.76

+8.9

0.001

T3

132.43

+9.1

112.56

-10.4

131.50

+7.9

0.001

T5

131.93

+8.6

102.10

-18.7

126.73

+3.9

0.001

T10

114.16

-5.9

101.66

-19.1

121.56

-0.3

0.001

Table 6

Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at different time intervals

Time

Groups

n

Mean

SD

P value

Post HOC tests P value

BL

Fentanyl

30

80.400

6.2511

0.087

F&C = 0.066

Clonidine

30

83.333

5.9616

F&N = 0.883

Nalbuphine

30

80.167

6.1030

C&N = 0.048

Ti

Fentanyl

30

90.33

7.6546

0.001

F&C =0.272

Clonidine

30

82.20

4.7590

F&N = 0.001

Nalbuphine

30

87.30

6.1552

C&N = 0.003

T1

Fentanyl

30

89.90

7.0255

0.001

F&C = 0.001

Clonidine

30

80.23

5.8054

F&N = 0.419

Nalbuphine

30

87.10

5.1404

C&N = 0.001

T3

Fentanyl

30

88.56

6.7126

0.001

F&C = 0.001

Clonidine

30

76.20

5.2021

F&N = 0.001

Nalbuphine

30

86.10

4.6989

C&N = 0.001

T5

Fentanyl

30

86.40

6.7688

0.001

F&C = 0.001

Clonidine

30

71.48

5.2898

F&N = 0.001

Nalbuphine

30

83.70

6.0841

C&N = 0.001

T10

Fentanyl

30

74.300

6.2596

0.001

F&C = 0.001

Clonidine

30

70.53

5.4233

F&N = 0.001

Nalbuphine

30

79.46

6.5777

C&N = 0.154

Table 7

Percentage change from baseline in DBP at different time intervals

Time

Group F

% change

Group C

% change

Group N

% change

P value

Baseline

80.40

83.33

80.16

0.087

Ti

90.33

+12.3

82.20

-1.3

87.30

+8.9

0.001

T1

89.90

+11.8

80.23

-3.7

87.10

+8.6

0.001

T3

88.56

+10.1

76.20

-9.8

86.10

+7.4

0.001

T5

86.40

+7.4

71.48

-14.2

83.70

+4.4

0.001

T10

74.30

-7.6

70.53

-15.3

79.46

-0.8

0.001

Figure 1

Trend of heart rate with different drugs during study period

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/522ef30a-4e12-4b55-acbc-675905642295/image/3556342c-85d3-4809-ba58-2f93e750b9c7-uimage.png

Figure 2

Trend of systolic blood pressure with different drugs during study period

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/522ef30a-4e12-4b55-acbc-675905642295/image/f9dcf7e0-bb0c-49c7-9daf-f58ad2e2fe98-uimage.png

Figure 3

Trend of systolic blood pressure with different drugs during study period

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/522ef30a-4e12-4b55-acbc-675905642295/image/599a264f-0dbe-44dc-a3d1-0cb43e1ea9f7-uimage.png

Discussion

Most of the patients undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia require endotracheal intubation. Laryngoscopy performed for intubation causes sympathetic stimulation which causes increase in blood pressure as well as heart rate.1 Upto 36 to 45% increase in systolic blood pressure and 20 to 45% increase in heart rate of baseline value may occur, if no specific preventive measures are undertaken.14, 15 Some patients may even develop arrhythmias. Various agents like calcium channel blockers, vasodilators, alpha 2 agonists, narcotics have been used to attenuate the pressor response to laryngoscopy and intubation.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Narcotics like fentanyl and nalbuphine, besides obtunding the haemodynamic response to intubation, also have advantage of maintaining depth of anaesthesia. Fentanyl, a pure agonist, acts on mu receptors.16 It’s onset of action is rapid and duration of action is short. It causes increase in parasympathetic tone while decreasing sympathetic tone.

Clonidine is an alpha 2 receptor agonist which has been used previously as an anti hypertensive agent and also used as an agent to blunt pressor response due to laryngoscopy and intubation. As shown by Zalundro et al. intravenous clonidine was better than oral clonidine in attenuating the pressor response.17 Bhalereo et al found that Clonidine given i.v as premedicant was effective in preventing stress induced heamodynamic response.18 Chawda, Pareek and Mehta found that 0.2mg/kg of nalbuphine given 3-5 minutes before intubation is effective in preventing the pressor response.19 Effectivity of Nalbuphine in dose of 0.2 mg/kg in achieving acceptably stable vital parameters and good anesthetic effect were proved by study of Nath R et al.20 These drugs have been studied and compared individually and amongst each other but have never been studied together in similar set of patients.

Study by Ko et al.21 concluded that optimal time to give Fentanyl so as to prevent pessor response to intubation was 5 minutes before intubation. In our study also, drugs were given 5 minutes prior to intubation. 5 microgram per kilogram (mcg/kg) body weight of Fentanyl can effectively obtund the haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy as found by Kay et al.22 but at the expense of side effects like nausea vomiting, muscular rigidity and bradycardia. Apnoeic episodes were seen by McClain in 4 patients with doses of 3.2 to 6.5 micro/kg of Fentanyl.23 We decided to use a dose of 2.0 mcg/kg of Fentanyl to prevent pressor response. Study by Yushi et al. found that Fentanyl in a dose of 2microgram/kg is effective in suppressing pressor response to endotracheal intubation.24 Post operative respiratory depression may occur in surgeries lasting less than one hour with high doses of Fentanyl.25, 26

Gupta and Tank also found that Fentanyl given in dose of 2 mcg/kg before induction was effective in obtunding pressor response to endotracheal intubation and laryngoscopy.27 However, they did not comment upon the optimum time for intubation after administration of the drug.

In our study, at the time of intubation, significant increase in heart rate was seen in F and N group whereas C group did not show any increase in heart rate (statistically significant) signifying that Clonidine was better in maintaining heart rate at the time of intubation.

Increase in heart rate in both groups (F,N) persisted at 3 minutes and gradually settled after 5 minutes. There was no significant variation in heart rate in group C through out the observation period. Our findings of change in heart rate in F and N group are similar to those by Rawal and Wennhager.28 Study by Ahsan et al on Nalbuphine also found gradual settlement of heart rate after intubation.15

Group C showed best control of HR as compared to Group F and Group N which is due to reduction in sympathetic outflow and increase in parasympathetic tone of central origin. The trend can be appreciated from Figure 1.29 Our findings are supported by study by Dipak and Malini who found Clondine was effective in attenuating pressor response to intubation.30

There was increase in blood pressure in both F and N groups at the time of intubation, which persisted even after 3 and 5 minutes after intubation, while a slight decrease in blood pressure was observed in group C. Systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure settled down to pre intubation levels after 10 minutes in group F and N where as maximum decrement was seen in group C (Figure 2, Figure 3). Our findings are in concordance with studies by Kalra NK et al.9 who found intravenous Clonidine was better in comparison to Magnesium sulphate in controlling blood pressure during laproscopic cholecystectomy. Study by Chaudhari M et al also found stastically significant increase in blood pressure and heart rate just after intubation in Nalbuphine group as compared to Clonidine group, corroborating our study findings.31 Our findings are also in concondrance with Bhalereo et al. who found that Clonidine given i.v as premedicant was effective in preventing stress induced heamodynamic response.18

Conclusion

Obtundation of pressor response during laryngoscopy is important to reduce the morbidity associated with increased sympathoadrenal drive. In this study we found that all three agents, Fentanyl, Nalbuphine and Clonidine were effective in achieving the objective of controlling the haemodynamic response to stress of endotracheal intubation. However, Clonidine proved to be superior compared to the other two as, the latter took 5-10 minutes to reach stable haemodynamic parameters while, Clonidine produced more stable haemodynamics in lesser time when given in dose of 2.0 microgram per kilogram 5 minutes prior to intubation.

Limitation

Limitation of our study is that in post-operative period patients could have been assessed for sedation and analgesia in all the three groups.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

C Prys-Roberts L T Greene R Meloche P Foex Studies of anaesthesia in relation to hypertension-II. Haemodynamic consequences of induction and endotracheal intubationBr J Anaesth1971436541710.1093/bja/43.6.531

2 

S C Kale R P Mahajan T S Jayalakshami V Raghavan B Das Nifedipine prevents the pressor response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in patients with coronary artery diseaseAnaesth1988436495710.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb06642.x

3 

K Mikawa K Nishina N Maekawa H Obara Comparison of nicardipine, diltiazem and verapamil for controlling the cardiovascular responses to tracheal intubationBr J Anaesth1996762221610.1093/bja/76.2.221

4 

H L Sun T J Wu C C Ng C C Chien C C Huang W C Chie Efficacy of oropharyngeal lidocaine instillation on hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubationJ Clin Anesth20092121037

5 

T E Black B Kay T E Healy Reducing the haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation. A comparison of alfentanil with fentanylAnaesth19843998837

6 

Y U Adachi M Satomoto H Higuchi K Watanabe Fentanyl Attenuates the Hemodynamic Response to Endotracheal Intubation More Than the Response to LaryngoscopyAnesth Analg2002951233710.1097/00000539-200207000-00043

7 

R Lohakare A V Sangawar A A Ghosh Influence of intravenous fentanyl and /or midazolam on induction of anaesthesia with thiopentoneJ Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol20042032738

8 

N K Kalra A Agarwal A Verma H D Pandey Comparative study of intravenously administered clonidine and magnesium sulfate on hemodynamic responses during laparoscopic cholecystectomyJ Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol2011273344810.4103/0970-9185.83679

9 

H P Yu S S Hseu H W Yien Y H Teng K H Chan Oral clonidine premedication preserves heart rate variability for patients undergoing larparoscopic cholecystectomyActa Anaesthesiol Scand20034721859010.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00038.x

10 

J M Swegle C Lo Gemann Management of common opioid induced adverse effectsAm Fam Physician200674134754

11 

R J Fragen N Caldwell Acute Intravenous Premedication with NalbuphineAnesth Analg19775668081210.1213/00000539-197711000-00012

12 

I D Klepper M Rosen M D Vickers W W Mapleson RESPIRATORY FUNCTION FOLLOWING NALBUPHINE AND MORPHINE IN ANAESTHETIZED MANBr J Anaesth1986586625910.1093/bja/58.6.625

13 

C L Lake E N Duckworth C A DiFazio M R Magruder Cardiorespiratory Effects of Nalbuphine and Morphine Premedication in Adult Cardiac Surgical PatientsActa Anaesthesiol Scand1984283305910.1111/j.1399-6576.1984.tb02066.x

14 

A D Malde V Sarode Attenuation of he hemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation: fentanyl versus lignocaineInernet J Anaesthesiol 2007121

15 

M Ahsan E H Kazmim Z Akhtar Nalbuphine prevents hemodynamic response to endotracheal intubationJ Coll Physicians Surg Pak20051566870

16 

R Atcheson D G Lambert Update on opioid receptorsBr J Anaesth1994732132410.1093/bja/73.2.132

17 

M P Zalunardo A Zollinger D R Spahn B Seifert M Radjaipour K Gautschi Effects of intravenous and oral clonidine on hemodynamic and plasma-catecholamine response due to endotracheal intubationJ Clin Anesth199792143710.1016/s0952-8180(97)00239-0

18 

P M Bhalerao S K Thombre U S Kapse K V Targe Intravenous clonidine for suppression of haemodynamic response to laparoscopy- A prospective randomised, placebo controlled, single centre studyInt J Adv Med2017437889210.18203/2349-3933.ijam20172273

19 

P M Chawda M K Pareek K D Mehta Effect of nalbuphine on hemodynamic response to orotracheal intubationJ Anaesth Clin Pharmacol201026445860

20 

R Nath S Dutta A Khandelwal Attenuation of Hemodynamic Response during Laryngoscopy and Intubation with Low Dose Intravenous NalbuphineJ Hematol Transfus20153510369

21 

S H Ko D C Kim Y J Han Small dose fentanyl: optional time of injection for blunting the circulatory responses to tracheal intubationAnaesth Analog19988665861

22 

B Kay T E Healy P M Bolder blocking the circulatory responses to tracheal intubation. A comparison of fentanyl and nalbuphineAnaesth198540109603

23 

D A Mc Clain C C Hug Jr Intravenous fentanyl kineticsClin Pharma­cology ther19802810614

24 

Y U Adachi M Satomoto H Higuchi K Watanabe Fentanyl Attenuates the Hemodynamic Response to Endotracheal Intubation More Than the Response to LaryngoscopyAnesth Analg2002951233710.1097/00000539-200207000-00043

25 

U M Kautto Attenuation of the Circulatory Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation by FentanylActa Anaesthesiol Scand19822632172110.1111/j.1399-6576.1982.tb01757.x

26 

H Stocked J H Hengstmann J Schuttler Pharmacokinetics of fenta¬nyl as a possible explanation for recurrence of respiratory depressionBr J Anaesth1979518741510.1093/bja/51.8.741

27 

S Gupta P Tank A comparative study of efficacy of esmolol and fentanyl for pressure attenuation during laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubationSaudi J Anaesth201151210.4103/1658-354x.76473

28 

N Rawal M Wennhager Influence of perioperative nalbuphine and fentanyl on postoperative respiration and analgesiaActa Anaesthesiol Scand199034319720210.1111/j.1399-6576.1990.tb03069.x

29 

H Talebi A Nourozi S Fateh A Mohammadza P Eghtesadi- S Jabbari Effects of Oral Clonidine Premedication on Haemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation: A Clinical TrialPak J Biol Sci2010132311465010.3923/pjbs.2010.1146.1150

30 

L R Dipak K M Malini Oral clonidine pre medication for attenuation of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubationIndian J Anaesth20024621249

31 

M J Chaudhari U Bhatia N Patel K Patel Efficacy of nalbuphine in preventing hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation in comparison to clonidineNHL J Med Sci201545864



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.