Print ISSN:-2394-4781

Online ISSN:-2394-4994

CODEN : IJCACT




Downlaod Files

   


Article Access statistics

Viewed: 1505

PDF Downloaded: 568


A double blind study comparing the effect of intravenous rabeprazole and pantoprazole on gastric pH and volume in laparoscopic surgery under general anaeshesia


Full Text PDF


Original Article

Author Details : Sumalatha GB, Ravichandra Ramesh Dodawad

Volume : 3, Issue : 4, Year : 2016

Article Page : 529-533


Suggest article by email

Get Permission

Abstract

Background and Aims: Major thrust in reducing potential for acid aspiration is increase the pH by various methods and pharmacological agents. The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of intravenous rabeprazole and pantoprazole on gastric volume and pH in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia.
Materials and Methods: Sixty patients of either sex, aged 18-55 yr, ASA physical status I or II, undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery were randomly assigned in to Group R and Group P to receive intravenous 20mg rabeprazole and 40 mg pantoprazole 15 min before induction of anaesthesia. The post-intubation and pre-extubation gastric aspiration volume and pH was measured with pH meter.
Results: The mean post-intubation volume was 20.52±4.46ml and 22.48±4.33 in group R and group P respectively. The mean pre-extubation volume in group P and group R was 15.14±3.66 and 11.10±2.84 respectively. The mean pH of post-intubation gastric aspiration contents in group P was 6.41±0.69 and in group R was 7.37±0.56. All values were statistically significant (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Intravenous rabeprazole is more effective than pantoprazole in reducing the gastric volume and increasing the gastric pH.

Keywords: Rabeprazole, Pantoprazole, Gastric volume, pH



How to cite : Sumalatha Gb, Dodawad R R, A double blind study comparing the effect of intravenous rabeprazole and pantoprazole on gastric pH and volume in laparoscopic surgery under general anaeshesia. Indian J Clin Anaesth 2016;3(4):529-533


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.