- Visibility 47 Views
- Downloads 6 Downloads
- DOI 10.18231/j.ijca.2024.103
-
CrossMark
High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) as a pillar to aid oxygenation perioperatively: A narrative review
- Author Details:
-
Geetanjali T Chilkoti
-
Michell Gulabani *
-
Ranajit Chatterjee
-
Chhavi Sharma
-
Poonam Sherwat
Geetanjali T Chilkoti
Michell Gulabani *
Introduction
High flow nasal cannula (HFNC), a non-invasive respiratory aid has become prominent when compared to other types of non-invasive respiratory assist devices, such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or non-invasive ventilation (NIV). This is due to its ability to deliver a significant fraction of heated and humidified oxygen at high flows via the nasal route.[1], [2] It enhances the patient’s comfort by virtue of its easy application while the heat and humidification help in the removal of airway secretions as well as avoid desiccation and epithelial injury.[3], [4], [5]
NIV is primarily useful in patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure due to an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. The NIV interfaces add to anatomic dead space; whereas, HFNC decreases dead space.
During the pandemic, HFNC played a vital role in managing corona virus- induced (COVID-19) patients with moderate-to-severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). The important concerns related to its use were the likelihood of infection transmission to healthcare personnel due to bioaerosol dispersion like with other modes of NIV and the requirement of higher oxygen flow.[6], [7], [8] These factors led to its limited and controversial use during COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, there has been inadequate scientific evidence supporting its use in patients of COVID-19 associated (AHRF).[9], [10], [11], [12], [13] The acute oxygen crisis during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic also led to limited use of HFNC in the Indian subcontinent.
The literature is replete with studies evaluating the role of HFNC in the management of AHRF in critically ill patients.[2], [8], [14], [15], [16] However, post-COVID pandemic in the last few years, HFNC oxygen therapy utilization has been extensive, especially in numerous non-intensive care unit (ICU) scenarios i.e. for pre-oxygenation before orotracheal intubation,[17] apneic oxygenation during the difficult airway management[18] and postoperative oxygen therapy.[19] The present narrative review aims to summarize the existing evidence with regard to its clinical application for providing oxygenation in non ICU setting i.e. operation theatre and post operative area.
Search strategies
The authors conducted a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar from January1st 2014 till April 30th, 2024. The search strategy in PubMed included a literature search with the following keywords (HFNC OR HFNO) AND with either (preoxygenation), (apnoeic oxygenation), (preoxygenation AND apnoeic oxygenation) or (postoperative oxygenation). This policy was then further adapted for other databases. Articles in the English language were included. Initially, the titles and abstracts were reviewed, following which full-text articles were retrieved depending on their relevance to this review. (Figure 1) All the articles were read by the two authors (G.T.C. and MG), and any discrepancies were resolved by consensus with the third author. Interventional, observational data, case reports/series, reviews and meta-analyses were included in this narrative review.
HFNC: Overview
HFNC involves delivery of an adjustable mixture of heated and humidified air and oxygen at rates that exceed the spontaneous inspiratory flow. It is also known as HHHFC i.e. Heated, humidified, high flow nasal cannula. Improved patient comfort and oxygenation are the major attributes of this device.
The two parameters needed to be set are the flow rate and the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2). First flow rate is set to 20-35L/minute (range 5-60 L/min).
The Fi02 (21-100%) is the next target to achieve the desired peripheral oxygen saturation. Heat and humidification help in preventing airway desiccation which further facilitates the removal of secretions. The high flow of oxygen helps to flush out the nasopharyngeal dead space, helping improve oxygen delivery and ventilation, additionally ensuring consistent and reliable delivery of a fraction of inspired oxygen. The positive end-expiratory pressure provided by HFNC, helps to further improve the oxygenation by reducing the work of breathing.[20], [21], [22]
Clinical utility of HFNC
Application of HFNC should be done in monitored care settings like the ICU, high dependency unit, operating room, or in the emergency department.[23]
The use of HFNC started with its use for management of AHRF in ICU setting. The clinical improvement with other modes of oxygen therapy like NIV is variable and conflicting evidence exists in its beneficial effect over that of HFNC in patients with AHRF. [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29]
It is also widely used for providing oxygen support in children with bronchiolitis who are at a risk for progression to respiratory failure by reducing the work of breathing, improving gas exchange, and thus avoiding endotracheal intubation.[30], [31], [32]
COVID -19 induced AHRF is another setting where HFNC was widely employed during the pandemic. It was observed that HFNC decreases the need for mechanical ventilation[10] and lowers intubation rates; [11] however, no reduction in the 28-day mortality or ventilator-free days [11] or likelihood of escalation of respiratory support[12] when compared with COT. Research articles comparing NIV with HFNC in the setting of COVID-19 are limited to a few RCTs only.[8], [13], [14] None of these studies established the superiority of HFNC over other modalities in terms of intubation or mortality rates. The ancillary applications of HFNC include its role as an aid in bronchoscopy[33] or for tracheal extubation of high-risk patients.[34]
The increasing availability of HFNC following the COVID pandemic led to its extensive use in the operating room (OR) as viewed by an acute surge in research articles over the past few years. In the OR, HFNC is used for preoxygenation before tracheal intubation, for apneic oxygenation during laryngoscopy, bronchoscopy, or difficult airway management, and for postoperative oxygenation to avoid reintubation and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs).
Discussion
HFNC for Apneic oxygenation
Apneic oxygenation (ApO) prolongs the safe apnea time and is used during laryngoscopy, bronchoscopy, rapid sequence induction (RSI), management of difficult airway (DA), and in the form a primary anaesthetic technique for laryngeal surgeries. The advantage of HFNC is that it does not hinder access to the airway and the disadvantage being that it impairs the facemask seal; without, an established position as a rescue technique for oxygenation in the already desaturating patient.
The mechanism of ApO using unwarmed, dry oxygen via standard nasal cannulae at 15 l/min is termed as Nasal Oxygen During Efforts At Securing a Tube (NODESAT).[35] Similarly, Transnasal Humidified Rapid Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange (THRIVE) works on the mechanism of ApO using heated and humidified oxygen.[36] The mechanism with which HFNC leads to ApO is known as “aventilatory mass flow”. During apnea, oxygen is drawn from the alveoli to the blood this leads to negative alveolar pressure and thus movement of oxygen from the pharynx into the alveoli. The HFNC here has the advantage of providing higher FiO2 along with positive airway pressure.
THRIVE is also used for “tubeless anesthesia’. The latter is a ventilatory technique that allows avoidance of tracheal intubation or jet ventilation in a few chosen laryngeal surgical cases when used intraoperatively. It provides the surgeon with a patient being completely along with an unobstructed view of the larynx. In addition, there is an unhindered approach to all parts of the glottis leading to better surgical precision, decreased operative time, and improved patient prognosis. Literature is replete with articles evaluating THRIVE for tubeless laryngeal surgery. THRIVE has been found to be safe for intraoperative oxygenation in designated patients undergoing nonlaser laryngologic surgery of short-to-intermediate duration.[37], [38] Recently, a meta-analysis has concluded that HFNC may be as effective as tracheal tubes in terms of providing oxygenation during laryngeal surgery but they suggested that conventional ventilation with tracheal intubation may be safer.[39]
HFNC for preoxygenation
Abundant literature is available, evaluating HFNC/THRIVE for preoxygenation (PO) before induction of anesthesia. Most of these studies have been conducted in obese patients,[40], [41], [42], [43], [44] patients undergoing RSI[45], [46], [18] and anticipated DA management.[34] In addition, the HFNC has also been used for preoxygenation in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery,[17] neurosurgical procedures,[47] in pediatric patients[48], [49] and in the elderly.[50], [51]
The efficacy of PO utilizing HFNC in obese patients is not clearly established. In this subgroup, HFNC has been compared to various methods of PO. One study claimed a face mask (FM) with positive end-expiratory pressure to be superior to HFNC for PO in obese subjects.[52] On the other hand, the one comparing it with NIV observed that HFNC in patients with obesity resulted in lower end-tidal oxygen after intubation and a higher rate of desaturation < 95%[53] similarly, on comparison with oxygen delivered via nasal prongs at 4 L min-1, with Optiflow THRIVE™ at a flow rate of 70 L min-1, a prolonged safe apnoea time pertaining to the latter was observed; however, the results were inconclusive.[54]
A meta-analysis evaluated HFNC for PO and ApO in the obese population and concluded no difference between HFNC and FM for PO in preventing oxygen desaturation (<92%) or lowest oxygen saturation before intubation.[55] However, the limitations of the study include a small sample, specific patient population, use of various FM preoxygenation techniques amongst different trials.
A recent met-analysis to evaluate the role of HFNC versus conventional oxygen therapy (COT) during the perioperative period in obese patients concluded that the former reduced the incidence of hypoxemia, need for additional respiratory support and the length of hospital in this particular group of patients. Nevertheless, the patient and clinical characteristics were not uniform as a subgroup analysis was lacking, in addition to limited number of trials included in this meta- analysis.[56]
HFNC also has a role in situations where bag-mask ventilation after induction of anesthesia is not desirable, to minimize the risk of regurgitation and aspiration in patients susceptible like obese, pregnant, and those with increased intraabdominal pressure. This kind of induction of anesthesia is popularly termed as rapid sequence induction (RSI). There has been conflicting evidence regarding the efficacy of HFNC in preoxygenation and apneic oxygenation for RSI in patients for emergency surgeries.
In an RCT,[18] where patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to either intervention (HFNC oxygenation at 60L/min) group or control (non-rebreather mask for preoxygenation) and nasal prongs of at least 15L/min oxygen flow for (apnoeic oxygenation) group, it was concluded that use of the former for PO and ApO failed to improve lowest oxygen saturation during the first intubation attempt but lead to prolonged safe apnoea time.
In DA management a thorough PO and ApO during laryngoscopy can significantly increase the safe apnoea time and contribute to a better prognosis. Current guidelines suggest the use of HFNC for preoxygenation in anticipated DA. However, there is a lack of evidence in this regard. Recently, the PREOPTI-DAM study,[34] compared HFNC with FM for anticipated DA and observed that former did not reduce significantly the incidence of desaturation ≤94% or bag-mask ventilation during an anticipated difficult intubation. The trial was underpowered to rule out a clinically significant benefit; nevertheless, patient satisfaction was improved with HFNC.
Amongst patients scheduled for neurosurgical[47] and GI procedures,[17] HFNC was observed to be efficacious for preoxygenation and ApO; however, the latter study claimed that the subsequent fall in partial pressure of oxygen and increase in partial pressure of carbon dioxide indicates that it is not as effective as bag-mask ventilation in maintaining oxygenation and ventilation following the neuromuscular blockade.
As far as its use amongst various patient populations is concerned, in pediatric patients, it is used primarily for ApO during laryngoscopy and has been found to increase the safe apnoea time significantly.[48], [49] In elderly patients, HFNC has been observed to increase safe apnea time and improve oxygenation.[50], [51]
There have been only two meta-analyses that have evaluated the efficacy of HFNC for PO and ApO.[55], [43] One was conducted in a specific subset of the population i.e. obese population[43] and the other in the general surgical patient population. Song et al.[55] in a meta-analysis did not observe any difference in desaturation between patients where HFNC or FM was used for preoxygenation. The shape of the oxygen-dissociation curve and patient factors may influence these findings; however, a comparison of oxygen partial pressure depicted no difference between the two techniques. This meta-analysis highlighted that HFNC does prolong safe apnea when compared to FM techniques for patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery.
HFNC for postoperative oxygenation
PPC’s are a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and longer hospital stays.[43] The incidence varies between 2 to 19% in non-cardiac surgeries to as high as 40% following abdominal surgeries.[57], [58] PPC’s include postoperative hypoxemia, atelectasis, bronchospasm, bronchitis, respiratory infection, exacerbation of previous lung disease, pulmonary collapse due to mucus plugging of the airways, pneumothorax, aspiration pneumonitis and respiratory failure with ventilatory support >48 hours.[59] Thus, it mandates the need for aggressive clinical management based on the identification of risk factors, and implementation of specific therapeutic approaches to optimize lung function and prevent PPC’s.
High-frequency nasal cannula has recently been employed for postoperative oxygenation following extubation in surgical patients.[19], [59] The edges of HFNC compared with COT include delivery of a predictable FiO2, better humidification, decreased anatomical dead space, and improved patient comfort.[60] Nevertheless, failure of HFNC in patients with pulmonary complications can lead to delayed intubation causing morbidity and mortality.[61] Therefore, the safety and efficacy of HFNC are being increasingly investigated in the literature, but findings have been inconsistent.[61], [62]
With an extensive literature search, we observed that most of the studies evaluating the efficacy of HFNC for postoperative oxygenation have been conducted in obese patients and following thoracic and cardiac surgeries.[52], [63], [64], [65] They concluded that the use of HFNC in comparison with COT helped to maintain the postoperative oxygenation, reduced the risk of re-intubation and the overall length of hospital stay. Routine surgical procedures like open abdominal surgeries with long surgical duration are considered to be implicated as strong risk factors for the development of postoperative hypoxemia; hence, suggesting the use of HFNC for postoperative oxygenation.
However, only a single study (OPERA trial) has evaluated the efficacy of HFNC for postoperative oxygenation following major abdominal surgeries but this study has not evaluated all blood oxygenation parameters and has also not incorporated any radiological method to rule out PPC’s, and quality of recovery. In addition, the primary outcome was the PaO2/FiO2 ratio at one hour which was an arbitrary endpoint and standardization for different aspects of patient care varied as it was a multicentric trial.[19]
The limitations of most of these meta-analyses included small sample size, clinical heterogeneity between trials, heterogeneous patient populations, different comparators, various clinical outcomes, variations in timing and duration of HFNC treatment, different lengths of follow up, and non-feasibility of double blinding due to the nature of the intervention. The questions that have remained unanswered include the duration of its use for postoperative oxygenation, the routine use of HFNC in clinical practice, and its feasibility in resource-limited setups.
Strengths and Limitations
The present narrative review included all randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews pertaining to the use of HFNC in the perioperative period. It provides an in-depth understanding of the role of HFNC in diverse clinical scenarios and different patient groups in the perioperative period.
Limitations and Future Recommendations
The present review is a broad overview of the use of HFNC in the perioperative period and being a narrative review it could easily lead to subjective bias due to lack of quantitative analysis. Robust trials with larger sample size and systematic reviews with subgroup analysis incorporating patients’ age, comorbidities, ASA status and clinical characteristics including type of procedure and interventional time point of HFNC to help establish its clinical efficacy and utility in the perioperative period over conventional modes of oxygen therapy are avenues for further research.
Conclusion
HFNC has an expanding role; however, indications are not absolute, with most benefits being physiologic. There is conflicting data regarding its efficacy for PO/ApO prior to intubation for elective surgical cases. However, for postoperative oxygenation, its use seems promising. Furthermore, large multicentric trials are desirable to validate these findings and their use in the emergency department needs to be explored. Dogmatic guidelines or at least institutional protocols may be formulated regarding its use in various aforementioned indications.
Source of Funding
None
Conflict of Interest
None
References
- N Rittayamai, J Tscheikuna, P Rujiwit. High-flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy after endotracheal extubation: a randomized crossover physiologic study. Respir Care 2014. [Google Scholar]
- B Sztrymf, J Messika, T Mayot, H Dreyfuss, D Dreyfuss. Impact of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy on intensive care unit patients with acute respiratory failure: a prospective observational study. J Crit Care 2012. [Google Scholar]
- J Bräunlich, D Beyer, D Mai, S Hammerschmidt, HJ Seyfarth, H Wirtz. Effects of nasal high flow on ventilation in volunteers, COPD and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients. Respiration 2013. [Google Scholar]
- T Mauri, L Alban, C Turrini, B Cambiaghi, E Carlesso, P Taccone. Optimum support by high-flow nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: effects of increasing flow rates. Intensive Care Med 2017. [Google Scholar]
- H Lenglet, B Sztrymf, C Leroy, P Brun, D Dreyfuss, J D Ricard. Humidified high flow nasal oxygen during respiratory failure in the emergency department: feasibility and efficacy. Respir Care 2012. [Google Scholar]
- H Avari, RJ Hiebert, AA Ryzynski, A Levy, J Nardi, H Kanji-Jaffer. Quantitative Assessment of Viral Dispersion Associated with Respiratory Support Devices in a Simulated Critical Care Environment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021. [Google Scholar]
- J Li, JB Fink, S Ehrmann. High-flow nasal cannula for COVID-19 patients: risk of bio-aerosol dispersion. Eur Respir J 2020. [Google Scholar]
- BL Ferreyro, F Angriman, L Munshi, LD Sorbo, ND Ferguson, B Rochwerg. Association of Noninvasive Oxygenation Strategies With All-Cause Mortality in Adults With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA 2020. [Google Scholar]
- CCH Leung, GM Joynt, CD Gomersall, WT Wong, A Lee, L Ling. Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula versus oxygen face mask for environmental bacterial contamination in critically ill pneumonia patients: a randomized controlled crossover trial. J Hosp Infect 2019. [Google Scholar]
- GA Ospina-Tascón, LE Calderón-Tapia, AF García, V Zarama, F Gómez-Álvarez, T Álvarez-Saa. Effect of High-Flow Oxygen Therapy vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Clinical Recovery in Patients With Severe COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2021. [Google Scholar]
- JP Frat, JP Quenot, J Badie, R Coudroy, C Guitton, S Ehrmann. Effect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen vs Standard Oxygen Therapy on Mortality in Patients With Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19: The SOHO-COVID Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2022. [Google Scholar]
- HJ Schünemann, J Khabsa, K Solo, AM Khamis, R Brignardello-Petersen, A El-Harakeh. Ventilation Techniques and Risk for Transmission of Coronavirus Disease, Including COVID-19: A Living Systematic Review of Multiple Streams of Evidence. Ann Intern Med 2020. [Google Scholar]
- B Rochwerg, K Solo, A Darzi, G Chen, E Borowiack, GP Morgano. Update Alert: Ventilation Techniques and Risk for Transmission of Coronavirus Disease, Including COVID-19. Ann Intern Med 2020. [Google Scholar]
- B Rochwerg, S Einav, D Chaudhuri, J Mancebo, T Mauri, Y Helviz. The role for high flow nasal cannula as a respiratory support strategy in adults: a clinical practice guideline. Intensive Care Med 2020. [Google Scholar]
- G Grasselli, CS Calfee, L Camporota, D Poole, MBP Amato, M Antonelli. European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Taskforce on ARDS. ESICM guidelines on acute respiratory distress syndrome: definition, phenotyping and respiratory support strategies. Intensive Care Med 2023. [Google Scholar]
- AK Baldomero, AC Melzer, N Greer, BN Majeski, R Macdonald, EJ Linskens. Effectiveness and Harms of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen for Acute Respiratory Failure: An Evidence Report for a Clinical Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2021. [Google Scholar]
- W Wang, W Zhang, Y Lu, Y Xu, Y Zhang, H Shi. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Transnasal Humidified Rapid Insufflation Ventilator Exchange (THRIVE) with Facemask Pre-Oxygenation in 40 Patients ≥65 Years of Age Undergoing General Anaesthesia During Gastrointestinal Surgery for Intestinal Obstruction. Med Sci Monit 2022. [Google Scholar]
- MT Chua, WM Ng, Q Lu, MJW Low, A Punyadasa, ME Cove. Pre- and apnoeic high-flow oxygenation for rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department (the Pre-AeRATE trial): A multicentre randomised controlled trial. Ann Acad Med Singap 2022. [Google Scholar]
- E Futier, C Paugam-Burtz, T Godet, L Khoy-Ear, S Rozencwajg, JM Delay. Effect of early postextubation high-flow nasal cannula vs conventional oxygen therapy on hypoxaemia in patients after major abdominal surgery: a French multicentre randomised controlled trial (OPERA). Intensive Care Med 2016. [Google Scholar]
- M Leeies, E Flynn, A F Turgeon, B Paunovic, H Loewen, R Rabbani. High-flow oxygen via nasal cannulae in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Y Chikata, K Morinishi, M Nishimura. Humidification in very-high-flow nasal-cannula therapy in an adult lung Model. Respir Care 2019. [Google Scholar]
- JP Frat, AW Thille, A Mercat, C Girault, S Ragot, S Perbet. High-flow oxygen through nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. N Engl J Med 2015. [Google Scholar]
- PG Jones, S Kamona, O Doran, F Sawtell, M Wilsher. Randomized Controlled Trial of Humidified High-Flow Nasal Oxygen for Acute Respiratory Distress in the Emergency Department: The HOT-ER Study. Respir Care 2016. [Google Scholar]
- GD Perkins, C Ji, BA Connolly, K Couper, R Lall, JK Baillie. Effect of Noninvasive Respiratory Strategies on Intubation or Mortality Among Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and COVID-19. JAMA 2022. [Google Scholar]
- YM Arabi, HM Al-Dorzi, S Aldekhyl, SA Qahtani, SA Abdukahil, EA Qasim. Long-term outcomes of patients with COVID-19 treated with helmet noninvasive ventilation or usual respiratory support: follow-up study of the Helmet-COVID randomized clinical trial. Intensive Care Med 2023. [Google Scholar]
- JD Chalmers, ML Crichton, PC Goeminne, B Cao, M Humbert, M Shteinberg. Management of hospitalised adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a European Respiratory Society living guideline. Eur Respir J. 2021;57:2100048. . Eur Respir J 2021. [Google Scholar]
- C Franco, N Facciolongo, R Tonelli, R Dongilli, A Vianello, L Pisani. Feasibility and clinical impact of out-of-ICU noninvasive respiratory support in patients with COVID-19-related pneumonia. Eur Respir J 2020. [Google Scholar]
- YM Arabi, S Aldekhyl, S AlQahtani, HM Al-Dorzi, SA Abdukahil, MK Al Harbi. Effect of Helmet Noninvasive Ventilation vs Usual Respiratory Support on Mortality Among Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19: The HELMET-COVID Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Y Helviz, S Einav. A Systematic Review of the High-flow Nasal Cannula for Adult Patients. Crit Care 2018. [Google Scholar]
- HC Pierce, JM Mansbach, ES Fisher, CG Macias, BM Pate, PA Piedra. Variability of intensive care management for children with bronchiolitis. Hosp Pediatr 2015. [Google Scholar]
- IP Sinha, AKS Mcbride, R Smith, RM Fernandes. CPAP and High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen in Bronchiolitis. Chest 2015. [Google Scholar]
- J Lin, Y Zhang, L Xiong, S Liu, C Gong, J Dai. High-flow nasal cannula therapy for children with bronchiolitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child 2019. [Google Scholar]
- CL Su, LL Chiang, KW Tam, TT Chen, MC Hu. High-flow nasal cannula for reducing hypoxemic events in patients undergoing bronchoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. PLoS One 2021. [Google Scholar]
- M Vourc'h, D Huard, ML Penndu, R Deransy, M Surbled, M Malidin. High-flow oxygen therapy versus facemask preoxygenation in anticipated difficult airway management (PREOPTI-DAM): an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled phase 3 trial. EClinicalMedicine 2023. [Google Scholar]
- RM Levitan. No Desat. Nasal oxygen during efforts securing a tube. Emergency Physicians Monthly 2010. [Google Scholar]
- A Patel, SA Nouraei. Transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE): a physiological method of increasing apnoea time in patients with difficult airways. Anaesthesia 2015. [Google Scholar]
- MN Syamal, J Hanisak, J Macfarlan, B Ortega, RT Sataloff, MS Benninger. To Tube, or Not to Tube: Comparing Ventilation Techniques in Microlaryngeal Surgery. Laryngoscope 2021. [Google Scholar]
- V Nekhendzy, A Saxena, B Mittal, E Sun, K Sung, K Dewan. The Safety and Efficacy of Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange for Laryngologic Surgery. Laryngoscope 2020. [Google Scholar]
- KC Chan, TX Yang, KF Khu, VS Ching, KK Fai. High-flow Nasal Cannula versus Conventional Ventilation in Laryngeal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Cureus 2023. [Google Scholar]
- M Vourc'h, G Baud, F Feuillet, C Blanchard, E Mirallie, C Guitton. High-flow nasal cannulae versus non-invasive ventilation for preoxygenation of obese patients: the PREOPTIPOP randomized trial. EClinicalMedicine 2019. [Google Scholar]
- J Rosén, P Frykholm, D Fors. High-flow nasal cannula versus face mask for preoxygenation in obese patients: A randomised controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2021. [Google Scholar]
- L Guy, R Christensen, B Dodd, A Pelecanos, K Wyssusek, AV Zundert. The effect of transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilator exchange (THRIVE) versus nasal prongs on safe apnoea time in paralysed obese patients: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 2022. [Google Scholar]
- MR Bright, WA Harley, G Velli, SF Zahir, V Eley. High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Apneic Oxygenation in Obese Patients for Elective Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Anesth Analg 2023. [Google Scholar]
- R Zhou, HT Wang, W Gu. Efficacy of High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Obese Patients during the Perioperative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Can Respir J 2022. [Google Scholar]
- F Mir, A Patel, R Iqbal, M Cecconi, S A Nouraei. A randomised controlled trial comparing transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE) pre-oxygenation with facemask pre-oxygenation in patients undergoing rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Å Lodenius, J Piehl, A Östlund, J Ullman, MJ Fagerlund. Transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE) vs. facemask breathing pre-oxygenation for rapid sequence induction in adults: a prospective randomised non-blinded clinical trial. Anaesthesia 2018. [Google Scholar]
- I Ng, R Krieser, P Mezzavia, K Lee, C Tseng, N Douglas. The use of Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange (THRIVE) for pre-oxygenation in neurosurgical patients: a randomised controlled trial. Anaesth Intensive Care 2018. [Google Scholar]
- S Humphreys, P Lee-Archer, G Reyne, D Long, T Williams, A Schibler. Transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE) in children: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 2017. [Google Scholar]
- T Riva, TH Pedersen, S Seiler, N Kasper, L Theiler, R Greif. Transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange for oxygenation of children during apnoea: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Z Hua, Z Liu, Y Li, H Zhang, M Yang, M Zuo. Transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange vs. facemask oxygenation in elderly patients undergoing general anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Y Shen, Y Xu, Z Fang, W Zhang, Y Zhang, C Zhang. New Suggested Enhancing Safe Apneic Time in Edentulous Elderly: A Comparison of Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange and Facemask. Med Sci Monit 2023. [Google Scholar]
- J Rosén, P Frykholm, D Fors. High-flow nasal cannula versus face mask for preoxygenation in obese patients: A randomised controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2021. [Google Scholar]
- L Guy, R Christensen, B Dodd, A Pelecanos, K Wyssusek, AV Zundert. The effect of transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilator exchange (THRIVE) versus nasal prongs on safe apnoea time in paralysed obese patients: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 2022. [Google Scholar]
- F Mir, A Patel, R Iqbal, M Cecconi, SA Nouraei. A randomised controlled trial comparing transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange (THRIVE) pre-oxygenation with facemask pre-oxygenation in patients undergoing rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2017. [Google Scholar]
- JL Song, Y Sun, YB Shi, XY Liu, ZB Su. Comparison of the effectiveness of high-flow nasal oxygen vs. standard face- mask oxygenation for pre- and apneic oxygenation during anesthesia induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol 2022. [Google Scholar]
- R Zhou, HT Wang, W Gu. Efficacy of High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Obese Patients during the Perioperative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Can Respir J 2022. [Google Scholar]
- BW Fisher, SR Majumdar, FA Mcalister. Predicting pulmonary complications after nonthoracic surgery: a systematic review of blinded studies. Am J Med 2002. [Google Scholar]
- VA Lawrence, R Dhanda, SG Hilsenbeck, CP Page. Risk of pulmonary complications after elective abdominal surgery. Chest 1996. [Google Scholar]
- L Ball, D Battaglini, P Pelosi. Postoperative respiratory disorders. Curr Opin Crit Care 2016. [Google Scholar]
- M Nishimura. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy devices. Respir Care 2019. [Google Scholar]
- BJ Kang, Y Koh, CM Lim, JW Huh, S Baek, M Han. Failure of high-flow nasal cannula therapy may delay intubation and increase mortality. Intensive Care Med 2015. [Google Scholar]
- C Ferrando, J Puig, F Serralta, J Carrizo, N Pozo, B Arocas. High-flow nasal cannula oxygenation reduces postoperative hypoxemia in morbidly obese patients: A randomized controlled trial. Minerva Anestesiol 2019. [Google Scholar]
- F Stéphan, B Barrucand, P Petit, S Rézaiguia-Delclaux, A Médard, B Delannoy. High-flow nasal oxygen vs noninvasive positive airway pressure in hypoxemic patients after cardiothoracic surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015. [Google Scholar]
- G Hernández, C Vaquero, P González, C Subira, F Frutos-Vivar, G Rialp. Effect of postextubation high-flow nasal cannula vs conventional oxygen therapy on reintubation in low-risk patients: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Y Yu, X Qian, C Liu, C Zhu. Effect of high-flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy for patients with thoracoscopic lobectomy after extubation. Can Respir J 2017. [Google Scholar]