Original Article
Author Details :
Volume : 9, Issue : 2, Year : 2022
Article Page : 247-253
https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2022.048
Abstract
Background: Palpatory method is traditionally used in clinical practice to locate the puncture site of combined spinal epidural (CSE) block, but locating the puncture site accurately in obesity and patients with difficult landmark or spinal deformity is usually difficult. For a successful CSE block, the puncture site must be accurately identified. The goal of this study was to see how ultrasonography (USG) affected the success rate of CSE puncture in these patients.
Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized study included 100 patients requiring CSE (needle through needle technique) of American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade I/II, age 18-60years, obese (BMI upto 35 kg/m2), patients with difficult landmark, spinal deformity and were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Ultrasound assisted group (USG) (n=50) or Surface landmark group (SLG) (n=50). The primary outcome was to compare the first-pass needle success rate for establishing CSE, with secondary outcomes including the number of needle puncture attempts, time to establish landmarks (t1), time to complete CSE (t2), total procedure time (t), block associated pain and complications.
Results: The USG group had a significantly greater first pass needle success rate (92%) than the SLG group (60%) p<0 xss=removed p=0.0003).>
Conclusion: Preprocedural USG improves first pass needle success rate and reduces the number of needle puncture attempts, decrease the procedural time thus lowering the risk of trauma, block associated pain, and discomfort to the patient.
Keywords: Epidural, Obesity Ultrasonography, Spinal
How to cite : Chitrambika P, Gupta M, Khan M A, Comparative study of ultrasound assisted versus conventional surface landmark guided technique for combined spinal epidural anaesthesia in patients with increasaed body mass index and difficult surface anatomy of lower back and spinal deformity. Indian J Clin Anaesth 2022;9(2):247-253
This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.