Print ISSN:-2394-4781

Online ISSN:-2394-4994

CODEN : IJCACT

Article History

Received : 19-03-2021

Accepted : 09-06-2021



Article Metrics




Downlaod Files

   


Article Access statistics

Viewed: 557

PDF Downloaded: 445


Nalbuphine versus dexmedetomidine for attenuation of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation: A randomised double blind comparative study


Full Text PDF


Original Article

Author Details : Akanksha Rathore*, Sujata Chaudhary, Mahendra Kumar, Rashmi Salhotra

Volume : 8, Issue : 4, Year : 2021

Article Page : 579-585

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.2021.123



Suggest article by email

Get Permission

Abstract

Background: Laryngoscopy and intubation are noxious stimuli which result in marked sympathetic response. However, literature search did not reveal any study comparing nalbuphine and dexmedetomidine for attenuation of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation.
Materials and Methods: After Institutional Ethical Committee approval and written informed consent, 80 ASA I and II patients were randomised in two groups of 40 each. Group N received 0.2 mg/kg of nalbuphine; group D received 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine over a period of 10 min. Anaesthesia was induced as per standard general anaesthesia practice. Haemodynamic parameters [Heart Rate (HR), Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), & Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)] were recorded at baseline, 0, 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 min following intubation. Patients were also observed for any side effects of the study drugs.
Results: There was a significant decrease (p<0> Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine was found to be more effective in attenuating haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation as compared to nalbuphine.


Keywords: Dexmedetomidine, Nalbuphine, Laryngoscopy, Intratracheal, Intubation.



How to cite : Rathore A, Chaudhary S, Kumar M, Salhotra R, Nalbuphine versus dexmedetomidine for attenuation of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation: A randomised double blind comparative study. Indian J Clin Anaesth 2021;8(4):579-585


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.