- Visibility 38 Views
- Downloads 19 Downloads
- Permissions
- DOI 10.18231/j.ijca.10098.1758886969
-
CrossMark
- Citation
A comparison of effect of oral pre-medication with clonidine and metoprolol on intraoperative hemodynamics and surgical conditions during functional endoscopic sinus surgery
Background: Maintaining hemodynamic stability and minimizing blood loss are critical goals in perioperative care. Clonidine, an α2-adrenergic agonist, and Metoprolol, a selective β1-blocker, are frequently used to modulate cardiovascular responses during surgery. Their comparative efficacy in reducing intraoperative blood loss and supporting postoperative recovery remains a subject of clinical interest. The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative efficacy of oral clonidine and metoprolol in maintaining intraoperative hemodynamic stability, minimizing blood loss, and enhancing postoperative recovery among adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia.
Materials and Methods: This prospective, randomized controlled trial included 60 ASA I–II patients aged 18–60 years undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Participants were randomized to receive either oral Clonidine (0.15 mg, Group A, n=30) or Metoprolol (50 mg, Group B, n=30) two hours before surgery. Intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, estimated blood loss, surgical field quality, and postoperative outcomes including pain score, nausea incidence, recovery time, and hospital stay were recorded and statistically analysed.
Results: The intraoperative heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation remained stable in both groups, with no statistically significant differences observed (P > 0.05). However, the Clonidine group demonstrated a significantly lower mean intraoperative blood loss compared to the Metoprolol group (137 ± 14.71 mL vs. 151 ± 9.94 mL; P = 0.0002), along with superior surgical field visibility, as reflected by a higher proportion of "Good" field assessments (70% vs. 56.7%; P = 0.041). Postoperative parameters, including pain scores, recovery time, and duration of hospital stay, showed no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: Clonidine and Metoprolol are both effective for intraoperative hemodynamic control and postoperative recovery. However, Clonidine demonstrates a distinct advantage in minimizing blood loss and improving surgical field quality.
How to Cite This Article
Vancouver
V.A BS, Natarajan S, Arunkumar B, Shanmugasundaram S, Periasamy P, Choudhary AK. A comparison of effect of oral pre-medication with clonidine and metoprolol on intraoperative hemodynamics and surgical conditions during functional endoscopic sinus surgery [Internet]. Indian J Clin Anaesth. 2025 [cited 2025 Nov 02];12(4):578-587. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.10098.1758886969
APA
V.A, B. S., Natarajan, S., Arunkumar, B., Shanmugasundaram, S., Periasamy, P., Choudhary, A. K. (2025). A comparison of effect of oral pre-medication with clonidine and metoprolol on intraoperative hemodynamics and surgical conditions during functional endoscopic sinus surgery . Indian J Clin Anaesth, 12(4), 578-587. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.10098.1758886969
MLA
V.A, Baseeha Sereen, Natarajan, Swadika, Arunkumar, Balasubramanian, Shanmugasundaram, Shanu, Periasamy, Panneerselvam, Choudhary, Arbind Kumar. "A comparison of effect of oral pre-medication with clonidine and metoprolol on intraoperative hemodynamics and surgical conditions during functional endoscopic sinus surgery ." Indian J Clin Anaesth, vol. 12, no. 4, 2025, pp. 578-587. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.10098.1758886969
Chicago
V.A, B. S., Natarajan, S., Arunkumar, B., Shanmugasundaram, S., Periasamy, P., Choudhary, A. K.. "A comparison of effect of oral pre-medication with clonidine and metoprolol on intraoperative hemodynamics and surgical conditions during functional endoscopic sinus surgery ." Indian J Clin Anaesth 12, no. 4 (2025): 578-587. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijca.10098.1758886969